|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:27 AM Original message |
If Bush/Cheney resigns from Plame, is it Pres. Powell, Frist or Hastert? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freetobegay
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. Well according to a document we use to follow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Uh, yeah, what he said...there is a legal order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. No that's only in the case of death |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastic cat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. For those who don't know, Fitzgerald is one of the toughest prosecutors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Will Bush Have a 'Saturday Night Massacre'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Timefortruth
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. Another possibility is immediate pardons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
3. No a resigning President does not get to choose his successor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Actually they can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. Would they really approave a new VP without serious hearings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. Hastert... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. This is rising out of speculation about indictments over the Plame case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Thanks.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I agree that they are too arrogant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Unless they persuade Bush to appoint Powell instead of Frist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. Hastert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clydefrand
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Is this all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. It is probably wishful thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Sorry if I confused Y'ALL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. No problem. It's still worth knowing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I thought so.
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
8. Don't believe FTW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 11:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. FTW is not the only source reporting indictments are coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
19. Bush started an illegal war on manufactured evidence and you think he'll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. You missed the point that first Bush is named as a co-conspirator in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. I'm not questioning the sources, only the conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Ah, well that is easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
20. Here's a nightmare scenario |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Jack, you're confusing line of succession with the right of the President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:27 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. What deal for pardons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. You're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
23. 1.) Speaker of the House, 2.) President Pro-Tem, 3.) Sec'y of State. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. It is NOT OPERATIVE in this case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
24. Right now, it's Hastert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Place holder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Aren't They Grooming McCain as the "Plan B Repub?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
30. I haven't much faith this will go anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:14 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Anything is possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I'm afraid you're right. Scooter Libby is a prime candidate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
36. Hmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. If you don't mind I will debunk the debunking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Feb 13th 2025, 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC