|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:43 PM Original message |
Don't Kill The Messenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaPat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. What parts aren't factual??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. "unproven propaganda" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. This from his link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
112. WHO GIVES A SH** IF IT WAS CLARKE ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
29. Well, Mr. Pitt, since you have laid down the challenge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Saudis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:10 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Well, if they're family members... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. bin Laden declared war on us since the 90's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. Bin Laden and the Taliban were not under suspicion before 9-11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. See post 44 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. have you seen the movie yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:30 PM Original message |
Goin' next week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
linazelle
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
51. It is NOT true that Bin Laden had no contact with ANY family some of his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
66. Got any links? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
linazelle
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:45 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. try Google--not hard to find n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:55 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. If so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:02 PM Response to Reply #77 |
86. Let's see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #86 |
95. Sounds like there is more speculation than proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. What are you talking about? While Americans were grounded, rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never cry wolf
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #102 |
108. For commercial flights ONLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbeyRoad
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:10 PM Response to Reply #77 |
119. Link- Cozy relations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smirkymonkey
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
115. Did you miss the part where it was stated that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRunner
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
41. It was Clarke's job to vett the passengers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:22 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. The point Moore made in the film |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catt03
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #44 |
61. My thoughts too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
63. So you are saying that Clarke made the error? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:44 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. I said "If" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. You say you are a journalist. Fine. But then you should know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. "You say you are a journalist" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:56 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. Then he made a mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
87. He never said he vetted them. He said that he OK'd the flights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #87 |
111. He did say he vetted them. I saw the interview yesterday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
88. Wrong! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #74 |
126. Have you read Clarke's book? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #44 |
64. I thought many of them were interviewed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbeyRoad
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:59 PM Response to Reply #64 |
83. out of 142 allowed to leave 30 were interviewed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Columbia
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. Page 13 says: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #89 |
103. Who made this conclusion? A person made this conclusion. Who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbeyRoad
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:23 PM Response to Reply #89 |
107. Is that the standard for detective work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #89 |
123. The same FBI that failed to coordinate information BEFORE 9/11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never cry wolf
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
110. Didn't the FBI just raid and shut down WAMY in Falls Church |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
81. Clarke never said he vetted the passengers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:12 PM Response to Reply #29 |
98. From Snopes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
33. Well-thrown gauntlet, Will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. to some degree unproven propaganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. ...you dingbat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. *tthhhhpppth* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRunner
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
49. Yo, Robb! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. "does a disservice to us" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Ya got a mouse in your pocket? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
39. "Us means us. Anyone who is interested in the truth. Does that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qanda
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
60. Welcome to DU Joe! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:57 PM Response to Reply #60 |
114. Thank you. I accept your welcome in good spirit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'd like to know what isn't factual please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moonbeam_Starlight
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. You started a whole new thread to say the same things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator
![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
136. Locking..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. Joe Joe, you're killing me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
11. Deleted message |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
12. Joe, Joe, Joe. Why am I not surprised that you've offered nothing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
65. I guess you are willing to believe Michael Moore's assumption, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:56 PM Response to Reply #65 |
78. Talk about misleading! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
92. Where does your buck stop, Joe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. and of course Joe never answers the questions posed to him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
67. You now have my attention. What is your question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRunner
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh jeez, now I'm really confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Honestly! I find it so hard to remember who are the evil-doers and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
15. The right wing media keeps repeating that this movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't think Moore was out to prove anything EXCEPT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
17. "Moore's proof just isn't there" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. JOE PROBABLY SHOULD BRING IT AT THIS POINT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
40. I already brought it. Check replies, Mr. Pitt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. back up what you say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. I already backed it up. Don't you read my replies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. See post 44 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. See post 44 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #40 |
93. You've brought NOTHING. Quit wasting our time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #93 |
113. It is less than honest to make the kind of link that Moore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. "Moore's proof just isn't there. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
21. Welcome to DU, have you seen the movie yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
23. Drop a stink bomb and flee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
24. Deleted message |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #24 |
47. Thanks for your warm reception. Seriously, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. True, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Not intended to piss anyone off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:36 PM Response to Reply #62 |
124. The presumed knee-jerk genuflection that you perceive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prodemsouth
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
25. Bang. Bang. Your dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
luaneryder
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
26. Please make your list public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
28. Your "reality check" bounced dude! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
52. I have to wonder if you even saw the movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:45 PM Response to Reply #52 |
71. Simple suggestions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #52 |
109. No Joe, my head has been right here for well over 2 years..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #109 |
116. Take your findings to the 9/11 commission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ParanoidPat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:11 PM Response to Reply #116 |
131. You're a funny guy Joe, perhaps you've been too busy blogging...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hey Joe, where you goin' with that gun in your hand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
31. On second thought, let's kill the messenger anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbbeyRoad
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
32. Nope. You're wrong, but nice try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. A blogger is NOT a "journalist", Joe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
35. Deleted message |
Stew225
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. What's the record for most replies? Maybe Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
necso
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
53. There is at least one area of what looks like factual dispute or omission, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
57. See post 44 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. See post 57 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:44 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. See post 122 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
linazelle
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. lmao i'll follow with post #123 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:34 PM Response to Reply #69 |
133. And Will should return his Mom's call; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
68. Pouring more lighter fluid on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #68 |
85. Great post! Thanks so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #68 |
94. You're right, lapfog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
72. Deleted message |
stickdog
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
79. You are the one "killing the messenger." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasSissy
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
82. Richard Clarke--someone had to TELL him to do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
84. Until you've seen the film |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
90. The Movie Was An Indictment Of The Simian In Chief On Film |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
91. snarf! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #91 |
101. I've seen the Movie. And again I am calling you out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:20 PM Response to Reply #91 |
106. Stocked up on your snarfs I hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
96. Yeah, I read your blog after your post in another thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
97. Welcome to DU Joe...but I disagree with you...I loath GW more! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
100. So the best you got is that Richard Clarke, an administration official... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
104. Where Are They Joe? The FATCUAL ERRORS from the Movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
105. AGAIN. That's what I thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:07 PM Response to Reply #105 |
118. List exact errors Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:11 PM Response to Reply #105 |
121. Notice that Joe has responded to other posts since you wrote this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
117. We don't know the truth. We've got conflicting statements. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #117 |
128. What we also have is a suspicious, but unidentified, motive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
linazelle
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
120. Can you list the factual errors Joe? Up your post count some more c'mon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
122. You have used a gamut adjectives, references, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:37 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. the trashing of Michael Moore and of DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. Say it ain't so Joe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:40 PM Response to Reply #127 |
135. Well said, trumad. Perfect, actually. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
129. Oh Man, you are a funny funny guy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
130. "Don't Kill The Messenger" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasBushwhacker
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
132. You may perceive a "lockstep" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. hammer meet nailhead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator
![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
137. Locking.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Feb 12th 2025, 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC