|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:10 PM Original message |
Green Party rejects Nader as nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. Go Cobb - you got my NY vote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freedomonk
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. sweet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Greens are smart. And serious about building their party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Good move on the Greens part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The Greens made a smart move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. This is what I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. That's correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContinentalOp
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Somawas
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. Great news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenInNC
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
9. Voted for Cobb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. This progressive THANKS YOU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. Hooray for Cobb! :^D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fenris
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. That improves my opinion of the Green Party quite a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massacure
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
12. So how many ballets does this keep Ralph off of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. About 22 States, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SW FL Dem
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. This is awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
36. none |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. So I guess it was always OK to vote Green |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Thanks for the support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nightperson
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. Bye Ralph! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. To all you atheists - I told you there is a God! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. The smartest thing they've done in their history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Petra Kelly would be proud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gardenista
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. Good for the Greens! Get out from under Nader's shadow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiverDave
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. Bye Ralph, you flaming egomaniac. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
23. Bush start packing your bags. This year Progressives will WORK TOGETHER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
25. Good for them. Nader has no interest in building the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. I will certainly take a look at them after this year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. that what I'm talking about! Plastic_Turkey rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gottaB
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
27. good deal n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IranianDemocrat
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
28. They're 4 years late. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberalboy
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
29. I never understood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. We do run from the grassroots level too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
31. Good! It's nice to have a second choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
32. A wise choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beloved Citizen
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
33. Nader Is Toast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kimber Scott
![]() |
Sat Jun-26-04 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
35. So, is a vote for Cobb a vote for Bush, or Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kazak
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-04 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
38. Media bias revealed (again)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chovexani
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-04 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
39. Good on ya, Greens! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Feb 12th 2025, 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC