|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:45 AM Original message |
Hearing on DSM NOW!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Ackerman's statement was incredibly powerful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
3. Anyone can give highlights? I don't have speakers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. He basically said he was a pacifist but voted for the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. his voice was shaking - really powerful! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
88. You know some BIG lies have been told when you see something ike that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
4. is this from CSPAN, or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. No, BES; just checked their website and nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. A mystery! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. got it from here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Thx! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSchewe
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
19. As ususual, the Dems will be shut out since the Bush-Apologist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
5. Who's the lady rambling now about her step son in Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. old news, in the past... blah blah blah need to look at the future blah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
7. That repug woman talking seems to be in deep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gumby
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Thanks; she sounded like she's 'out there'. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #20 |
94. Ros-lehtinen has revealed some shocking insider information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
14. Kicked and recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
15. The chairman is a POS, he'll be up against the wall when the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Martti
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. POS indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:08 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Oh yeah, he mentioned the WTC being "obliterated". Good thing we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:10 AM Original message |
BUT ... He is a refreshing improvement when compared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
18. So... it's a crime to lie to congress, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:11 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Rob Menendez making a similar point re: "oversight" vs "politics" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Thanks so much for the info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:13 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I assume you are referring to the Clinton era |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:15 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. "lying to congress"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:16 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. No, I meant Rumsfeld's meeting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:18 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. The hypocrisy (flip-flopping?) of how the Repubs treated Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:19 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Ah, gotcha... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #32 |
59. the state of the union address is made to congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:44 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. yes it is all connected! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Think it needs to be sworn testimony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:20 AM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Really? I thought just presenting falsified data was enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:40 AM Response to Reply #40 |
56. Yeah, it pretty much is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:52 AM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Thanks! Good info - Rumsfeld knowingly or unknowingly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
21. Who is this guy speaking now? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. R Menendez, D NJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. whoever he is he ROCKS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
33. I'm with Molloy, all Republicans are slime. I cannot even listen to this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSchewe
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
35. It is all George Tenet's fault, a CLINTON appointee... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
36. Yawn. How many times are they going to mention Big Dawg? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
38. This guy is conflating 9/11 with Iraq, and characterizing Iraq as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
41. Notice the use of "Islamicist" = Islamic + Terrorist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:23 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Saddam was secular, you repub congressional idiots! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
42. BRAVO to whomever is speaking now!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:25 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Jim de Ment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSchewe
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
45. Valerie Plum? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:25 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Sounds like a delicious pudding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:26 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. he keeps mispronouncing it!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #48 |
57. Intentionally, no doubt... these creeps are lower than low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:27 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. In the library, with the candle stick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. LOL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
46. Talking about Valerie Plame now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gumby
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
50. Could Henry Hyde sound more bored or bothered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Really! He was putting me to sleep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
51. Ackerman up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSchewe
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
52. kicked/nominated n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
55. Calling out that we are in a single party state -- OOH MS. LEE UP!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
58. Ms. Barbara Lee is KICKING ASS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
61. RECESS, back at 2pm EST to vote on the resolutions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
62. Is there a transcript? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 12:49 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. I'll keep my eyes out for one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Thank you I appreciate it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSchewe
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
63. They are just going through the motions n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
66. IT'S BACK ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:10 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. I just tuned in again. What are they voting on? Thank you! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. I think it's on bi-partisan DSM hearings - the yes votes are to throw out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Thanks! So far lots of No votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:10 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
69. going through votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
73. announcing roll... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:15 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. and the 22 ayes, 21 nos, 1 voted present - OMFG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:15 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. DID THEY JUST VOTE YES ON 375 ?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. They voted YES to KILL it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. BY 1 FEKKIN VOTE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. If it had a shot of passing this whole thing would not have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. I am thoroughly depressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #79 |
87. Don't be depressed, be thankful that Conyers and others are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. Ron Paul abstained. He is the Present. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. Cowardly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. Seems like it. I am curious how Specter is going to vote on Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
80. 408 is killed 22-22- 1 voting present |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. who is it voting present?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terre
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #81 |
91. Ron Paul |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
83. Conyers is on CSpan now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. thank you! C-span 1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alizaryn
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
86. So, how did it come out? Did all 3 pass? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSchewe
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
89. So what was the conclusion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terre
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 02:50 PM Response to Reply #89 |
93. All Resolutions tanked :o( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Wed Sep-14-05 03:23 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. How can the Congress fail the American people like this? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue May 13th 2025, 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC