cowboys, dressed as indians, kill some white settlers, & the war goes on

[mopaul]

that's what happened with the two british soldiers in basra. it's an old trick that goes all the way back to the beginnings of humanity.

a bunch of cowboys dress up like navajos and slaughter a family of white settlers and the indians take the blame, and the war against the indians escalates.

not all insurgents are insurgents, not all car bombs are iraqis, some are british, AND SOME ARE AMERICANS, don't doubt it for a minute.

it doesn't make sense to the common person, but it doesn't have to, it's war, and war is what the brits and americans want, not peace.

[cthrumatrix]

1. if there were no "insurgents" the US people would demand the troops come

home...

we lost the truth many years ago

[Richard Steele]

2. Dressing up isn't even necessary, if you kill all the witnesses.

The whites would walk in in their everyday clothes,
then drop a few arrows and tomahawks after they killed
everyone in the place.
(and then buy their land for pennies on the dollar a week later)

And car-bombs need no extra planted "evidence";
they are ASSUMED to be the work of "insurgents" or "terrorists".

No one EVER takes fingerprints off an Iraqi car-bomb.
Why is that?

[cthrumatrix]

3. same reason you don't want an investigation of 911 and blg 7

it causes more questions than answers

[deminks]

4. And someone shoots the messengers, too.

More journalists now have died in Iraq than in Vietnam, I read in an article somewhere yesterday.

[mopaul]

5. ----------------

[Minstrel Boy]

6. War is what they want, and they want it to escalate

and to pursue it across the borders of Iraq.

If more people admitted this simple truth that the warmongers admit themselves, things would come into focus to them.