|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
herbbrown
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:02 PM Original message |
Hey You Nader Haters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmeel
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. I do respect him for showing up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yup ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Yossarian Joad
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. He kicked ass today! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. Fantastic point. And I'll be writing major Dems to shame them too. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. Know what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neuvocat
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. How come you aren't there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yep. Ralph done good today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. Jesse Jackson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Yes, Rev Jackson is wonderful. :^) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. I believe main DEMS would not want to be associated with ANSWER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poor Richard Lex
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. "Not a dime's worth of difference" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Nader was indeed a liar when he said that - I don't trust those funded by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:27 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Not a liar I don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
12. I'm confused ... and surprised to see him there ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Agree, he has done much good for years, but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
13. Decency? He's a fading narcissist. He showed up because someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
15. We turned it off. It was not an anti-war rally, it was all ANSWER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Here here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
herbbrown
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. You Can't be neutral on a moving train |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. That rally was a train wreck. Sorry, but it was not anti-war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. They are not willing to associate with ANSWER. Where was Ralph in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
herbbrown
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I'm for Nader and against Facism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Wow. I'm NOT for Nader and against facism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VADem11
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJac
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. So true......Leading Dems have a shrinking nut sack...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. Frankly, I can see why they didn't go. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lecky
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
27. I'm glad they didn't show up, this rally is a mess! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Sat Sep-24-05 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
29. Locked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Apr 24th 2025, 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC