Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Brooksley Born Raises an Important Question, But Answers are Weak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 02:32 PM
Original message
Brooksley Born Raises an Important Question, But Answers are Weak

Have you ever wondered what a synthetic CDO is, or whether it contributed to the housing bubble? At a recent hearing held by the Financial Crisis Investigation Commission, Brooksley Born asked questions designed to get answers for you. A complete answer would lead to a fuller understanding of the role of credit default swaps in the housing bubble.

The panelists are from Citibank: Murray Barnes, was involved in risk management, and Nestor Dominguez, who worked in CDOs are the speakers. There is a brief description of CDOs at the end of this post. A synthetic CDO issues credit default swaps on other entities, including CDOs and real estate mortgage backed securities. A hybrid CDO issues credit default swaps and holds other debt instruments, such as securities of other CDOs and subprime mortgages.

Born is trying to find out if the issuance of synthetic and hybrid CDOs made the housing bubble last longer and cost more. Watching the panelists answer, youd think they had never thought of that question. Eventually, Dominguez says it didnt extend the housing bubble because it didnt require any origination. Yves Smith explains why that is wrong in her excellent book ECONned: How Unenlightened Self Interest Undermined Democracy and Corrupted Capitalism. She thinks the housing bubble was significantly affected by synthetic CDOs.

A number of firms, including Goldman Sachs, are known to have bet against the securities they were selling to investors. Whoops, sorry, Goldman Sachs says it was just a market maker, and denies that they were betting against their investors.
Smith gives a detailed description of Wall Street strategies. The explanations are complex, and what follows is only a sketch. Interested readers should read Chapter 9 of ECONned closely.Smith explains that synthetic CDOs were first formed in mid-2005, when the International Swaps and Derivatives Association formalized the procedures for issuing CDSs on tranches of CDO securities. Before then, investors could buy insurance from the monoline insurance companies, like AMBAC. Suddenly anyone could write protection, or buy protection on just about any tranche of a CDO.

That led to this strategy called credit arbitrage. The hedge fund buys a low tranche of a CDO, and buys protection on the next higher tranche. For example, the hedge fund buys the BBB tranche of a mezz CDO, and buys a CDS on the A tranche. While the CDO is functioning, the BBB tranche throws off cash to the hedge fund. If the CDO fails, the hedge fund makes a big profit by collecting on the CDS if the A tranche goes down along with the BBB tranche. Mezz CDOs are full of the worst of the securities of other CDOs so that seems likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommending reading the article and the links.
Knowing this "stuff" is really really critical, as the banksters count on us being too un-interested in
money matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Flash of blinding insight....they did this to COUNTIRES, too!
Edited on Sat Apr-10-10 03:12 PM by dixiegrrrrl
Since a CDO can have ANY kind of debt inside them, they can have a city, a county, or a countries's debt
( bonds) and bet against the debt being paid off.
They can, in effect, bankrupt the world.

Plus...this is getting so much "group" of say, Goldman Sachs can make money by selling the bonds for the city, another "group" of GS can make money by packaging the CDOs, a 3rd "group"
can be GS Hedge fund people to bet against them.
I think I got that right, yes?

edit: add link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. CDSs caused demand for high risk tranches to explode. CDSs were supposed to insure against loss if
CDO defaulted. Thus institutional investors who by charter are not allowed to invest in high-risk securities felt they could invest in high risk CDOs becsause the CDSs eliminated the risk of loss of your investment. At least that's how it was supposed to go. Of course, if the entity selling the CDS (AIG) didn't think to hold enough in reserve to cover payment of 'called' CDSs then the house of cards fell flat .. and so too the economy.

Deregulation Delusions. Thanks to the Commodities futures Modernization act, slipped in as a rider to the Omnibus funding bill (11,000 pages) in the last days of the Clinton administration by Phil Gramm, Credit Default Swaps were by law unregulated, not even monitored.">more on CFMA


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't believe in the tooth fairy either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 24th 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC