Remember that BOA moved about 80 trillion $$$ of derivatives into its own bank?
And it seemed strange?
Over at Market Ticker, there is a possible understanding of why.
And why we need to understand what clawback means, and how it can hurt even bank depositors.
Summary: "Recently Bank of America transferred a bunch of derivatives into their banking arm.
"A bunch" means somewhere around $80 trillion worth.
Now pay very careful attention, because part of the bankruptcy "reform" law in 2005
placed derivative claims in front of depositors in a business failure - including a bank failure. What JP Morgan is claiming in the MF Global case is that the derivative trade (which is exactly what a "Repo to Maturity" trade is - it's a derivative)
is entitled to preference in the case of MF Global over those who had cash there for safekeeping either as a margin deposit or just as free cash as you would hold free cash in a bank.
If a major bank blows up this very same claim, supported in existing Bankruptcy Law with the changes signed by George Bush in 2005,
will be used to steal the entirety of your bank account, and if you detect the impending blowup shortly before it happens -- say, 90 days before -- you're still exposed to the risk through clawback!"
Link to whole article:
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=198650Notice that last sentence.
even if you have closed your account BEFORE a bank goes bankrupt, you STILL can be liable for clawback. Repeat: derivatives legally get paid off before depositors.
BOA moved all its derivatives to its own banks.
BOA's bank stock is down to 1/3 of what it was a year ago, has had more losses than any of the other big banks.
It will make tons more money by going bankrupt and stealing depositor's money to cover the derivatives than it will by continued operation.
You do the math.