Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need examples of climate researchers having their grants threatened for holding to the truth.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 09:37 PM
Original message
Need examples of climate researchers having their grants threatened for holding to the truth.
Do any of you have any instances you could link to, of climate researchers having their research money threatened for refusing to back down on their findings about global warming/climate change? I could really use them right now since I'm in a "debate" with some idiots on another board who refuse to see that anti-global warming propaganda provides many times more income to fossil fuel industries than the truth does grant money to scientists.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. James Hansen, at NASA, for most of the Bush Administration
Edited on Mon Jan-25-10 10:43 PM by Dogmudgeon
Just search a few of the terms, like "http://www.google.com/search?q=hansen+nasa+climate+threat&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8">Hansen NASA climate threat".

It was extensivly covered.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I found this article useful


Professor Pitman was a lead author on the IPCC's 2001 and 2007 reports. He is also the co-director of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales.

Professor Pitman says sceptics have used the IPCC's error to skew the climate change debate.

"Climate scientists are losing the fight with the sceptics," he said.

"The sceptics are so well funded, so well organised. "They have nothing else to do. They don't have day jobs so they can put all their efforts into misinforming and miscommunicating climate science to the general public, whereas the climate scientists have day jobs and actually isn't one of them.

"All of the efforts you do in an IPCC report is done out of hours, voluntarily, for no funding and no pay, whereas the sceptics are being funded to put out full-scale misinformation campaigns and are doing a damn good job, I think.

"They are doing a superb job at misinforming and miscommunicating the general public, state and federal governments."

And he says if scientists lose the climate change debate, it would be "potentially catastrophic".


http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/01/25/2800992.htm

The denier idiots always work this way. It is essentially a game of wack a mole. They put up stuff and you have to debunk it. All they have to do to "win" is to put up bunk at a faster rate than you can debunk. I think the best way to deal with them is to make a salient point or two and then ignore their foolish rants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe there is some info in the archives at UCS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 24th 2025, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC