Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World's Ships Produce More SOX Than All Vehicles Combined, More CO2 Than Some Nations - AFP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:15 PM
Original message
World's Ships Produce More SOX Than All Vehicles Combined, More CO2 Than Some Nations - AFP
Ocean-going vessels now belch out more of the major air pollutant sulfur dioxide than all of the world's cars, trucks and buses combined, according to a study released Thursday. The group behind the report, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), also said the shipping industry emits more of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide than many industrialized nations.

The ICCT, comprising transport and air quality experts from around the world, called on the industry voluntarily to clean up its act and also submit to tough standards as part of efforts to combat global warming.

"International ships are one of the world's largest, virtually uncontrolled source of air pollution," said Alan Lloyd, the ICCT's president and former secretary of California's Environmental Protection Agency. "Air pollution from diesel trucks and buses in Europe, Japan, and the US has declined steadily for over a decade. At the same time, air pollution from international ships is rising virtually unchecked," he said.

The study said the sulfur dioxide (SO2) content of marine diesel fuel is an average of 27,000 parts per million (ppm), compared to just 10-15 ppm for road fuels in Europe, Japan and the United States. SO2 is blamed for causing respiratory illnesses and acid rain, and for forming atmospheric particles that choke off air visibility.

EDIT

http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Global_Shipping_Must_Curb_Unchecked_Pollution_999.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. good. let's stop buying chinese stuff! we really do not need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. This could get ugly.
If Mr. and Mrs. Bubba can't buy that $30 bedroom suite, I predict rebellion.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. they also move more tonnage than all of the rest combined
so, why is this a surprise to anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Probably out of sight, out of mind for most people
But, geeze, 27,000 ppm sulfur? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Action item here:
"However, the IMO is debating whether to adopt a new round of emission standards for international ships leading up to meetings in April and June, the ICCT noted.

It called on the IMO to mandate a 90-percent reduction in marine diesel's sulfur content, use up-to-date technologies to govern emission standards, and set new standards to address the impact of climate change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sailing ships, anyone?
Container ships with computer-controlled masts and riggings, plus an auxiliary engine for when the wind may die down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Or sails for auxiliary power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. On the other hand...
Doesn't that mean that ships are the mainstay of the "global dimming" that's one of the few things working against global warming?

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sounds we need some international regulations on marine diesel fuel and marine engines. (nt)
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 08:57 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razzleberry Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. jet aircraft are a much bigger problem
tax on jet fuel for international flight is zero.
the vast majority of jet operation is frivolous.

ships do needed work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 29th 2025, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC