Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Musharraf rails against 'extremism'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 10:44 PM
Original message
Musharraf rails against 'extremism'
President Pervez Musharraf has called upon Pakistan's Islamic leaders to launch a nationwide movement to rid the country of "terrorism" and "extremism".

Musharraf made the appeal on Wednesday as he addressed a convention of 2000 religious scholars and clerics from all Muslim sects from across the country.

The president, who came to power through a military coup in 1999, called upon the participants to promote unity and harmony and to root out sectarian violence.

"We are all Muslims and we should not indulge in highlighting differences between Shia and Sunni Muslim sects. We should not try to impose our views on others," he said.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D850230E-C21F-462A-810F-33E1FB988B66.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. just a few days before 9/11/01...
...Musharraf was extolling the virtues of Taliban and their "Islamic" way of life...

He speaks with a forked tongue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Politics
Edited on Sat Feb-21-04 07:56 AM by _Jumper_
He was saying that because it was politically expedient for him prior to 9/11. I believe he truly is against extremism. All the women in his family are college-educated. Does that sound like a fundie to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Political expediency
"He was saying that because it was politically expedient for him prior to 9/11."

Oh...so how do you know that what he's saying now is not due to political expediency?

One only has to look at this guy's past to find out about about his views. He forcibly overthrew a democratically elected government in his country...and engineered a fourth war aginst India in 1999...which caused Clinton to step in ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think I agree with _Jumper_ here...
Musharraf is anything but pure - rather, he is a corrupt and brutal leader - but the emnity between him and the Islamists is great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. His personal life
He clearly is not a fundie. I don't think that he is a great ruler but he definately is not a fundie and I believe he truly opposes them.

He is a dictator but overthrowing an elected government and warmongering does not mean he is an Islamic fundie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "fundie" - is a relative term
So he believes in female education, and drinks some wine with his dinner...

but what about his views on:

- separation of church (mosque) and state?
- treatment of minorities (what is left now) in Pakistan?
- Shia and Sunni problem
- Ahmediya muslims
- freedom of press
- feudal control of property and business in Pakistan...

Just because he doesn't wear a beard and turban does not make him a "moderate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Does that mean anyone college educated can lead a coup against a
democraticly elected government?

Why do Islamics have to rid themselves of 'Fundamentalist' but we allow them to stay in the White House and Justice, and Dept. Def...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why is America afraid of "Fundamentalists" in Islamic countries?
when they have fundamentalists in power right at home?

In my opinion, America should let the people of Islamic nation decide who they want in power. I say, it is better to have an ELECTED fundamentalist, than a "Moderate" dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Dec 10th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC