Discretion: Retired cop denied CA CCW after attack, politicians allowed

TPaine7

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 05:24 PM
Original message

Discretion: Retired cop denied CA CCW after attack, politicians allowed

Matt Speckman, a former Turlock police sergeant, used to be in charge of processing concealed gun permits. Now retired, he'd like one himself.

... "...I've been involved in investigations of people now getting paroled who have probably been throwing darts at my picture in their cells."

Speckman, 49, attended the FBI academy, trained at a nationally recognized firearms course, earned an MBA, is studying for a Ph.D, toted a gun for 30 years and screened gun permit applicants for seven years.

Yet Turlock Police Chief Gary Hampton and Sheriff Adam Christianson, both of whom have approved gun permits for politicians and prominent businessmen, turned him down.

Source: http://www.modbee.com/2010/04/09/1122196/ex-turlock-cop-denied-concealed.html

I'm confused in that I thought retired police officers could carry nationwide. Nevertheless, this story shows how arbitrary and capricous the "authorities" can be in doling out civil rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Name removed

(0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message

1. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Name removed

(0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1

4. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

damntexdem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message

2. I don't like concealed carry. But if anyone is going to be allowed, it would seem this guy would.

So it looks like some official may be a little capricious in doling out gun privileges (screw calling it "rights").

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TheWraith

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. Um... right to keep and bear arms?

You might want to read Heller.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

pipoman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2

5. Right along with screwing

accuracy and equal protection too huh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Arctic Dave

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message

6. Strange. Wonder what the rest of the story is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Katya Mullethov

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. Yeah

Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 06:26 PM by Katya Mullethov

They probably cant afford the stamp to mail it back to him .

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Arctic Dave

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7

8. Maybe he has anger issues. You should look into that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

tburnsten

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Apr-12-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8

9. He wouldn't have made it to retirement if he were a hazard carrying a gun

For the record I do know one officer who is in good standing yet has consistently demonstrated that he should not be wearing a badge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Dec 10th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.