|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:39 PM Original message |
"No state background check for gun buyers, Minnesota House panel decides" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. It makes more sense to use a federal system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrcheerful
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well senator bat shit crazy did say she wanted the state armed and dangerous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. So you want to make it easier for assassins to buy guns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Did you read the article? It doesn't say there will be no background checks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Here's a cold pack for that knee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The NRA is against federal background checks as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. "NRA’s position is that NICS is in need of improvement." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Have you read the article yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beevul
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. First... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. When your pal Bush and Cheney set up a "democracy" like Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. So you think MN's local background check was superior to the FBI's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. With two background checks there's a greater chance of finding something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Ummm, the FBI's database incorporates the databases from all states... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. You need to become better informed on the subject, Ken. Presently MN does not use NICS at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Do I detect some disinformation here? It seems the NRA disagrees with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. If Minnesota spent that money getting their mental health records into the NICS database |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RSillsbee
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. You are totally off topic but just for the Hell of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. There are still going to be background checks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Not what is going to happen. Do not let facts get in your way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowrider
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. The damned NRA has too much influence with Minnesota politicians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. The federal system works fine ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YllwFvr
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
21. my state uses its own system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawodevolution
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
22. yoink! Another law bites the dust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Apr 30th 2025, 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC