|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Woody Box
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:03 PM Original message |
MIHOP theories: an overview |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Or Plan 4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Woody Box
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. But this is LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. No, knowing of a plan and letting it happen is Lihop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Woody Box
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. re:multi-planers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecessaryOnslaught
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Whatever the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Woody Box
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. four-planners? you mean "fore-planners" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
number6
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. MIHOP 1A. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 08:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. "Were the pilots mind controlled"?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
number6
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 10:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dinyc
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Pilots "hijacked" perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 10:38 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. You mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I do see your point, but mind control would be too risky, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abe Linkman
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Neither would ANY of the Arab men named as 9-11 hijackers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Another personal attack, Abe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dinyc
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 07:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 08:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. %s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. There is no room in the radar evidence for that hypothesis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 12:41 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. re: deal breaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abe Linkman
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 08:01 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Promoting the Caveman scenario requires creative explanations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dinyc
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. REALITY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 01:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. this is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 02:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Sorry to "harp" but.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 02:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. sorry again...my bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dinyc
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 08:51 AM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Why yes. Yes I have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 10:35 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. re: BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 11:27 AM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Quick reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dinyc
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 11:47 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Quicker reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 12:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. The only way it can make sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 01:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Exactly! A plane full of fuel would make enough of a "bang" by itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 02:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. denial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abe Linkman
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. There's no denying the pod. Prof. photo analysis also proves it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dinyc
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Prof. photo analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 04:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. pod pod pod |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Actually, if I was forced to subscribe to a CT, "remote control" looks the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 09:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Multi-planes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 01:22 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Even if your scenario WAS plausible, WHY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abe Linkman
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 01:32 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Re: your observation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 01:40 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. As I explained before, I don't believe it happened this way, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 02:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Primary Radar Returns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 02:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. At Cleveland Center, it's a facility-wide SOP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Lost from radar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 05:38 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Actually, none of that has anything to do with my assertions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 08:32 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. So if they were swapped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 08:44 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I'm saying IF the primaries were deselected... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 09:12 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Radar Mosaic System |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 10:04 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Some radar history: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 09:14 PM Response to Reply #42 |
60. One more time, atc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 09:28 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Why must the planes have landed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. It did, they weren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 09:41 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. But, if they "disappeared" at altitude (when the transponders were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Planes disappear from radar all the time, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 09:35 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. In some places, at low altitude (where terrain interferes), yes. NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Exactly, NOT at altitude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. No, the transponders were turned off at altitude, not near the ground. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Thu Jun-17-04 08:06 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. No link needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Fri Jun-18-04 12:20 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Not always, but yes, frequently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 09:53 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. to keep them quiet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. See Post #42 above... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Flight 93 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. I'll admit, I'd like to see an explanation of the last 3 minutes, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abe Linkman
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. You're assuming there IS one - that's plausible. There isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 06:05 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. You never quit, do you? Want to answer the questions I've asked ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Woody Box
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 04:46 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. Every MIHOPper should ask himself regarding Flight 93: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 05:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. 93 and then some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medienanalyse
![]() |
Wed Jun-16-04 04:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
55. SMACK - Mercutio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medienanalyse
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dinyc
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 10:47 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. How are you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Feb 18th 2025, 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC