Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Craig Bartmer, NYPD first respondent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 03:58 AM
Original message
Craig Bartmer, NYPD first respondent
Random notes -
Former Bush Supporter. Melted 5 pair of boots. He has post traumatic stress disorder and a collapsed lung. It sounds like he didn't go until that afternoon. He witnessed wtc7 fall and ran from it. He says he heard a lot of explosions, thoom, thoom, thoom, et al....9-11 Commission is a farce, the steel disappeared really fast, he said there were rumors that the mob was stealing it ...It was not treated like crime scene. He said it was cleaned up - FAST! No one is getting any money from health problems caused that day. His buddy had clothes analyzed and there was something like 98,000 times the amount of asbestos (PULL IT!) and other metals, in the clothes.
He said he was right there when 7 came down and there was no warning, hardly any fires, hardly any smoke, just suddenly "it's coming down, get out of the way!" 70% responders sick, people afraid to say anything. Why was Dick Cheney in charge of NORAD? Only thing incompetent is the cover up. Of course they could do 9-11 look at the resources these people have...He says he is not offended that people want to get to the truth, he is a victim and he is not offended and neither are the families of the other victims so stop using that as an excuse...


http://www.studyof911.com/video/flvplayer/speaking_out.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's another reference to 'melted boots'
that I happened across yesterday.


Once we got to New York, the MITAC bus driver took us downtown to St. Paul's, the chapel at the edge of Ground Zero. A frowning N.Y.P.D. officer approached, saying, "You can't stop here."

"Wait!" I said. "We have work boots." I opened the first cargo bin. "See?"

The frown immediately became a smile. "Oh! Okay."

The police officers cleared a path through the crowd, so our 38 MIT volunteers could carry donations into the church.

The boots were especially needed. The eight-story pile of twisted steel and debris was still smoldering after two months, and the heat was melting the soles on the workers' boots.

Once inside, we learned there was a waiting list for boots. One recipient did an impromptu dance, singing "I Have Happy Feet." Another insisted we take a picture of his feet in the new boots.

Overall, the fuss was disconcerting. Boots meant that much? Worker after worker came over to thank us, several saying, "Thank you for remembering us."

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2002/groundzero-0605.html



So 2 months after the attack, the site was still hot enough to melt people's boots. This is after hosing it down on a daily basis. What the hell was in this pile that was still that hot, for that long?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't be using MIT as a source 'round here...
Didn't you know? They're part of the Bush cabal, and are wholly funded by Raytheon.

It's true. I read it on the internets.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would want to distract from the OP, too, if I were you..heh heh...
and, I am interested in your post. Could you please direct me to the source that says MIT is part of the "Bush cabal"? and could you please direct me to the source that says that MIT is "wholly" funded by Raytheon? Thank you, I know that you are always honest in your representations of what others say, so it shouldn't be a problem for you to provide that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Miranda, you know....
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sure, right here...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=121607&mesg_id=131971

The poster may not have spelled it out quite so explicitly, but the implication was clear.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL. Too funny.
Edited on Tue Jan-09-07 09:50 PM by Kingshakabobo
Not only was it said....it was said by mirandapriestly...


>>>>that and agencies whose directors have been appointed by the Bush administration and Universities like MIT which are funded by Raytheon, whose name is emblazoned on the "Active Denial" gun <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G Hawes Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ouch.
That's gonna leave a mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You can't see how he misrepresented my words?
I knew that is what he was referring to. I also knew he was MISREPRESENTING what I said. Raytheon DOES fund MIT, I did not say it WHOLLY funded it, I did not say it was part of the BUSH CABAL either. The wording is clearly different with the intent of smearing me. God, grown men/women doing stuff like this? how embarrassing for you! (not to mention desperate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Yes, what you wrote was misrepresented
and, I know you won't fall for phony concern for you about being "manipulated". Funny that this concern just now surfaces. Wonder why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. There were a lot of eyewitness reports of explosions. Very curiuos. I haven't
seen an OCT account that ever honestly and openly addressed this issue.

I've seen it downplayed, I've seen it explained away as mass hysteria, I've seen pancaking floors and and kitchens all used to try to shrug off the fact that a lot of people heard, saw, felt, or heard and saw and felt what they described as explosions.

That seems like pretty strong evidence to think, gee, I wonder if there were secondary explosions. But not strong enough, apparently, that anybody at NIST thought to test for it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. no explosions seen
people heard noises they described as explosions.

two different things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Explosions were SEEN and heard by many.
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 04:29 PM by nebula
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. But not by many who think it was a controlled demolition today.
In fact, as anyone who follows your link will see, many of the quoted witnesses make clear that they don't think explosives were used to demolish the towers. Some of those clarifications you had to cut out of the quotes so that you could misrepresent them. I've made that quite clear in the responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Well, you're the expert
in twisting what all those witnesses clearly said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Demonstrated how I twisted what those witnesses said...
...and how they're actually saying something else.

For god's sake, YOU are the one quoting them and clipping out the parts that prove you wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. MP -- remember that PM? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, I'm on it.eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Excellent! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. A kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. I fear you're being manipulated.
I wouldn't peg you as someone who bows to peer pressure, mp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Okay, I'll bite. By whom am I being manipulated?
other than everyone and anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. "everyone and anyone?" lol Check your PM. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hmmm...
must kick! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Has anyone asked HOW MUCH WOULD IT HAVE COST TO DESTRUCT
THE WTC? I mean Silverstein would have had to PAY to have them demolished as opposed to his collecting 3 billion on his insurance policies whith only his 200 million investment? What return on investment is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Much cheaper to hijack a plane and crash it, right?
Have you estimated how much your favorite Conspiracy probably cost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. very ...
interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 07th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC