|
they think I oughta say. I don't work for them (in fact, THEY work for ME = and EVERYBODY ELSE HERE, TOO).
I've won arguments with screwball bush-bots in the last few days by leaving them with this one (because it always seems to close the discussion - have yet to hear a comeback to it): "Look, if YOU performed this poorly on YOUR job, would YOU still be working?"
Also: Tim Russert actually ask this of chertoff, on camera - isn't it true that the Department of Homeland Security's own website says it has the primary responsibility in times of national disasters?
ALSO: If they start yammering about how - "well Clinton was in office for EIGHT years and he didn't do anything, either. This has been going on for 20 years. They all knew. And none of 'em did anything. It's not just bush." - remind them that Clinton left FEMA in excellent shape, well-organized, well-run, well-funded. That's the condition FEMA was in when georgie-poo got it. And georgie-poo cut FEMA back (BEFORE 9/11), and downgraded it from where it had been (near-Cabinet-level status) so its chief didn't have any authority. Clinton's FEMA chief, the experienced and VERY credible James Lee Witt, was highly-regarded and widely-respected by both parties. Can that be said of bush's "brownie"? (EEuuwww... the mental picture that conjured up... ). AND, Clinton didn't send one out of every three National Guardsmen to Iraq, along with just as large a ratio of critical and much-needed equipment - like high-water trucks, on a war based on lies, either.
There's more, but others here know far more than I on some issues. But there's OOOODLES of material to poke holes in what any of these apologists or excuse-makers are trying to sell.
|