|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
bigdarryl
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:15 AM Original message |
Any Du'ers tired of the Clinton/Obama media BLITZ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yes. I like all the potential candidates and wish attention were spread around. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Agreed. It's great that those 2 are getting air time, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
2. I was tired of it a long time ago. The media is forcing those two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. acmaum i agree 100% with you the media is trying to make us Progressives vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. And disrespctful of the democratic processes of the Republic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. one should ponder WHY are these two candidates being shoved down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
34. I agree completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
capi888
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
40. agree totally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
42. One thing's certain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #42 |
56. Stop your exaggerations! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
primative1
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
13. My thoughts exactly ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INdemo
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
5. Its all just media wishful thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
7. Conservative Democrats will always be media darlings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Well, since both of them are among the top progressive Democrats in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. there' nothing PROGRESSIVE about Hillary she goes which way the wind blows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. her objection to the Iraq war was it was run incompetently, not that it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Nice spin, BigD. Hillary just happens to rank in the top 10% of Progressive Senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. so why is she calling for afghan troop level increase and a "sustainable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Oh c'mon. Most of our "favorite" Dems are calling for redeployment to Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Let's see ... she's opposed to the surge in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
31. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand the inequity in how she's treated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. character assasination of other DUer's for no reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Character assassination of candidates by using negative phrases out of context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. which "favorite" dems are calling for a sustainable retention of forces in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. At least put this "sustainable retention" thing in the full text in which it was said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I DID provide a link in the previous post, however, it appears the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. I'm glad you admitted your mistake here & in post #33, which clears Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
50. your welcome. I guess I'll not get an apology for character assasination, tho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. No problem & I'm sorry if you were offended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Not according to my calculations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Your calculations are wrong. Clinton & Obama are way above your linkless data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Progressive punch uses a different methodology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Zodiac...the key here is they are your calculations... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. At some point, judgement comes in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Thanks for posting this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Progressive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
9. let's do the math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
14. Whom Gods Destroy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
15. That's what happens when you're as likable & charismatic as Hillary & Obama are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INdemo
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
16. This media blitz is perhaps working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Think Of All The Votes It Would "Save" Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nevergiveup
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
18. Count me an exception. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
20. Well, the same thing happened with Dean in 2003. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
26. Nope. It's good news for us. Only Republicans should be tired of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
27. No. I think neither has faced the cameras and serious questions ENOUGH at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
28. It's always like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
29. I am not, love to follow the debates.....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. I just wish more were allowed to participate in it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
41. Not at all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
44. Yes. I long for the days of the constant bashing of Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Byron
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
45. I'm sick of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
47. It feels like 2003 all over again: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
53. I don't want either of them as our candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
54. I'm tired of being in constant campaign mode.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
57. You rather hear more about McCain and RudyG? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
58. Hillary's back from Iraq. A majority of bloggers are interested in what she has to say.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Feb 12th 2025, 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC