|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:22 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do You Pledge To Support "Your Candidate" In 2008, Without Smearing On Other Dems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Some Sad Results Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Glad To See The Tide Is Turning, A Little Anyway : ) (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerry fan
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. IMO, if you have to "smear" another candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That's For Sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. Debating facts is to everyone's benefit in the long run. Smearing mars everyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. I voted yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yet Another Classy Kerry Supporter: ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. I will! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Wow, You Sure Have A Way With Words BOSS : ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. Right on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerrytravelers
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
8. I will, in the end, support whoever the nominee is. I will not smear anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. Depends on what you call "smear" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I Think Most Here Know What A Smear Is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. ah, there's the rub |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. Smears are usually RW spin, something we all recognize or should by now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Smears are usually a difference of opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. The recent manufactured outrage against Boxer was RW smear against her and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
13. The dispute will arrive on the definition of "smear" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I was just going to post the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. Do you pledge to let others share their views without locking them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. What Are You Talking About? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I am referring to the new feature that Skinner implemented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
56. Some people are not interested in a dialogue they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. Let's face it: there is no such thing as the "perfect" candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernsoul
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
18. Define "smear" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasterDarkNinja
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
19. Mostly yes, depends on your definition of 'smear' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 07:26 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. That's fine....but where I draw the smear line.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. I would agree with your definition of "Smear" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Hey Crispi ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
20. yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
21. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
24. I believe strongly in debating facts, statements and record, not smear campaigns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
40. I Believe Strongly In That Too- I Agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Heh...repeatedly for some of us. ;)) And, oh yeah, stalking threads isn't cool, either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
26. this smear job on Obama was beyond the pale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Ouch! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Lieberman gets attacked for not wanting investigations, and so should any other Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. Lieberman IS NOT A DEM... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I call out Dems who say there is no need for investigations - they are wrong, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:07 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. Lieberman IS NOT a DEM...nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Obama said there is no need for investigations into Bush's decision to invade Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. this DU'er called out that smear on Obama pretty good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
28. As many hear have already said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Where things get vague is on writing opinions on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Sounds pretty good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
31. Well, there was a good smear job this morning concerning Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Now THAT was a smear job because Obama didn't do what was stated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fuzzyball
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. Is ours a democracy or dictatorship? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
39. Define smearing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. See blm's Post # 24 (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. keep in mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Byron
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
43. No to DLC-approved candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:08 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. The DLC doesn't bother me..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
49. I voted No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1
![]() |
Wed Jan-17-07 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
55. Yes. I will only fire in self-defense...I don't believe in preemptive war. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Thu Jan-18-07 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
57. As long as "smear" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Feb 17th 2025, 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC