Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fuck Ralph Nader!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:02 PM
Original message
Fuck Ralph Nader!
- We needed a matching set.

- Because Ralph Nader deciding he's going to take right wing money to screw things up for Democrats, he deserves to be told to fuck off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Red_Storm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. the fuck is goings on .........

with all the fuck threads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridaguy Donating Member (751 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't know, but it's kinda fucking funny. (n/t)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridaguy Donating Member (751 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4.  Oh I forgot, Ralph Nader is an egotistical fuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. .
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 07:18 PM by Hav
some idiot started a "fuck Kerry" thread,had 100 posts and the rabid Kerry haters here were having orgasms.
I guess these "fuck" threads now are just making fun of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yea!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Allow me to paraphrase Skittles for a moment
FUCK YOU NADER YOU SCRAWNY SACK OF SHIT. YOU GO OFF AND FUCK YOURSELF AND STOP WARSHIPPING BUSH*!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ralph isn't as bad as the fools who will vote for him.

At least he is so blinded by his own ego that he cares more about self-aggrandizement than the good of the country or the planet.


What's their excuse?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. .
:: Raises fist ::

Voting against Kerry!!


signed,
The Principled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I won't be voting for Ralph this time
but he's no more egotistical, than say, John Edwards. Or George Bush. Or Bill Clinton. He's probably actually less egotistical than those three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Like Hell
He serves no purpose now other than to jack off his own ego. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. He's no more egotistic than any of the others
and over his career, he's done more good for the country than the others I've mentioned put together. As to his running this year, I think it's a foolish thing to do, but he has the right to do so, as uncomfortable as that makes a lot of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. I reiterate, his sole purpose is to masturbate his ego.
That makes him more egotistical.

Of course it's his right, everybody has the right to jack off, so does he. But to pretend that Nader's past history as an opportunistic whore that happened to have a noble cause somehow makes up for his current self-massage as an opportunistic whore with no clue is .......... :silly: .

He just can't seem to stop himself. Oh well, he is getting really old in more ways than the obvious. We can always hope for heart disease, stroke, aortic aneurysms, preferably something quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Well I wish he would hurry up and cum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is that true?
Is Nadir really going to take right-wing money? I never thought he was that low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He took oil company money in 2000. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Looks like Kerry is in the pocket of big oil and labor.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4302564/

(excerpt)

MATTHEWS: How about ANWR? You guys want to see ANWR because you want to see guys working in your business. I guess theres a lot of Teamsters jobs up there lined up and organized, if you could put a pipeline up to the Alaska wilderness. He is against that.

HOFFA: Well, we talked about that.

He says, look, I am against ANWR, but I am going to put that pipeline in and were going to drill like never before.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: What, are they going to run water through it?

(CROSSTALK)

HOFFA: ... more jobs than the ANWR would have ever created.

MATTHEWS: What are they going to run through the pipeline?

HOFFA: And thats the position hes taking.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: But he is against drilling up there. What are they going to run through the pipeline?

HOFFA: Well, they are going to drill all over, according to him. And he says, were going to be drilling all over the United States. And he says that is going to create more jobs.

(CROSSTALK)

(LAUGHTER)

MATTHEWS: You got that guy rolling.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: What position was he in when he made all these promises?

(CROSSTALK)

(LAUGHTER)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Looks like you're in the pocket of pathological liar Hoffa
Haha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Kerry just took the support of a pathological liar?
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 08:28 PM by ozone_man
Not that I disagree with you mind you. If you go to bed with dogs, you wake up with fleas.

Also, even if he is a pathological liar, it doesn't mean he wasn't telling Mathews the truth. Does Kerry have a recent position on ANWR, or better yet, has he said anything about this interview?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. a few, yes
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2003_1109b.html
"John Kerry has a long history of standing up to special interests on behalf of the environment. He has stood up to stop acid rain, to stop Bush and the Republicans from drilling in ANWR, and has fought for higher fuel efficiency standards. Kerry will bring his commitment to the environment and courage to fight special interests to the White House."


http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2002_0122.html
"When California was desperate for electricity they proposed drilling in ANWR even though only 1% of California's electricity was oil based and not an additional drop would appear for 10 years. I was publically warned by Trent Lott that the lights were literally about to go out in Massachusetts, all my constituents were going to freeze to death in the dark, and I would bear responsibility. For the record, I would like to note that the electricity is still on. In fact, we even had enough power to keep the stadium lights burning as the New England Patriots literally slid by Oakland last Saturday night.

When California resolved its crisis and the economy turned down, they then began to argue ANWR was a jobs program even though studies show far more, far better jobs in other endeavors and that all their estimates were based on false analysis. No matter.

Now the proponents are more interested in arousing our fears than in discussing the facts.

The latest claim cleverly suggests that ANWR can become a replacement for oil from Saudi Arabia or Iraq. The quick reaction of everyone is to welcome the image of freedom from buying oil from those linked with terrorism. The problem is that's all it is - an image. First, the refuge would not even reach peak production until 20 years from now. It cannot possibly impact the war we wage today.

More importantly - recognizing that under the Administration's own proposals we will be more dependent on imported oil in 2020 than we are today and that increasing demand for oil will quickly gobble up whatever comes from small U.S. supplies, it is impossible to U.S. produce our way out of dependency and avoid the increasing demand curve. The United States has only 3% of the world's reserves to be matched against the fact that we use 25% of the world's supply. And guess what - Saudi Arabia has 46% of the world's reserves. The solution is not in ANWR - it's in less dependency on oil itself.

Perhaps the most bitter irony amid all their claims of the need to drill, are the more than 7,000 existing leases for oil and gas exploration in the Gulf of Mexico - 80% of which, covering 32 million acres, are not producing oil because they're being mapped or sit idle as companies wait for the price of oil to rise to maximize profits. Last May the State of Alaska completed a lease sale of 950,000 acres on the North Slope, the largest lease by any state in history and has announced another seven million acres will be put up for lease this year. The Department of Interior is putting three million acres of federal land from the National Petroleum Reserve up for sale. Maybe one day someone could make an argument for the need to drill in the refuge, but the industry's inaction in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska proves that time is not now -- and it won't ever have to come if we make wise choices."


http://www.johnkerry.com/communities/enviros/record.html
Democratic Senator John Kerry promised to try and block the bill when it arrives in the Senate. I will filibuster any effort to drill in the refuge. It will never pass the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #28
46. Can't insult 3 million Teamsters because their leader is a goof
There's a lot of great Teamsters. Unfortunately, they have a less than optimal leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catholic Sensation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. you know there was another thread on this
and the person who didn't realize Hoffa was joking was flamed into admitting that she messed up. You see the "(LAUGHTER)"? They knew Hoffa was joking. It wasn't that subtle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joyautumn Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. false
don't lie on top of insulting -- the issue was, if you recall, that he held stock in a mutual fund which included oil company and some other unsavory stock. we raised hell with him about it and his response was that he has always worked against the interests of oil companies and would gladly see his stock plummet as the result of his campaigning. his record is clean on that -- he has never pulled any punches on any corporation that he held stock in. he socks it to them no matter what.

on the contrary, part of his plan to take America back from the corporate elite has always been to energize voters, stockholders and consumers in a three-pronged citizens' movement to lay seige to the public commons that have been usurped by the elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. It's all green on the back
The hell of it is that I can remember way back (before half the folks on this board were born) when "Nader's Raiders" were heroes to folks like us.
Whoda thunk he'd end up an even bigger egotistical sack of shit than Ross Perot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Politics makes strange bedfellows.
Not many were complaining about Al Sharpton receiving financing from a right winger (Stone). The left fractured itself, as it is so good at doing, by having Kucinch and Sharpton syphoning off Dean votes. And i don't know if this was done as a conspiracy or not.

Now that Dean is out I'm tempted to vote for Nader, but I think I'll stick with Dean as a write-in. ABKB I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. SCOTUS. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Darn it, I wanted to say that!
You beat me to it. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. POOP.
POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP. POOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. A saint?????
A saint like Bernardo de Guy....

He's an egotistical asshole and I wish him ill....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. In that case, Nader would be either a saint--
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 08:01 PM by janx
or an opportunist.

The timing is certainly interesting. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. And Lucifer was an angel
If you vote for Nader, you're voting four more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Bullshit....If all of you democrats actually voted.....
...there would be no issue of Nader "stealing" the democrats votes. The whole notion that he stole votes is putrid. Think about how many first time voters he attracted to the voting process itself.

Yet, it's the green party's fault that their voters don't vote democrat?
I know alot of Libertarians who also vote third party, some of them voted for the Greens just to bump their numbers up. How would you feel if they decided the lesser of two evils were the repukes? This type of whining means you are nervous your candidate won't get enough support within his own party!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Don't tell me what to do,
I'm asking you.

Is defeating George Bush important to you?

If it is, you should vote for the only candidate who can beat him - the Democratic candidate.

For me, beating George Bush is important. I plan of voting Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Are that poor a GOP plant that you mix up Nader and the Green Party?
Study you facts and the RW's talking points memo a bit better next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. That's right don't address my point, call me a repuke instead...
...of asking "why" such a large part of the electorate chooses not to particpate in the electoral process. It's just so much easier to point fingers at third party voters. So in your conspiracy ridden world, the far left progressives who decided they would actually bother voting for a candidate in 2000, were more at fault that Gore lost than perhaps democrats in his own party opting out of voting at all.
Frankly, I'm not surprised at the responses...it's so much easier than actually attracting the non-voting public. Of course we had a candidate, Howard Dean, that was attracting non-voters to participate. However, the status quo democrats decided that what they really needed was a "strategic" candidate, not one with real convictions. Fine...that was your choice. I get to vote in the primary soon too. Understand that some of us are still very upset with what happened to the Dean candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. Hey everybody, it's a "greenie"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #29
50. repeat message
Edited on Sat Feb-21-04 04:09 AM by progressivebebe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #29
53. No, he didn't steal the votes. He SPLIT the votes--and lied his ass off
He appealed to the idealistic voters knowing full well he won't ever have to deliver on his unrealistic promises because he knew he'd never win. He's just a clever liar. It turned out to be, at best, a fucked up political statement. It's such a good scam for the repugs, they couldn't come up with better if they tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Screw him and the crypto-fascists that vicariously thrive on misery
Funny that, I keep raising this issue and I only got a single reply from... a Dean supporter! Bless him/her and Dean - for having the courage to say and do what's necessary, and not what simply "looks good" but won't ever be done in one or two terms.

Odd huh, how well the far left is in lockstep with the far right.

Well fuck 'em all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. That's because the mainstream politicians, the ones
pushed by their own party and given breaks by the media, don't have the guts to do what's right--only what's politically convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. Exactly
Which is why I respect Dean and (still) support Clark...

But even without them in this "race" I'll continue pushing for reform from within the Democratic Party.

Too much is at stake for comfort...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. AMEN BABY ! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurk_no_more Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. And his supporters too!
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 10:00 PM by lurk_no_more


Assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. No thanks...he's one ugly motherfucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. Watch it. He may say thank you ;-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. Nah, I don't swing that way
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
43. Nader as an independent will not even get on the ballot in many states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
45. Kerry folks all in arms about Nader. Dean supporters weren't so scared
I wonder if there's a message in there for those who care to ponder...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. This Kerry supporter isn't scared because I know that many of you...
Edited on Sat Feb-21-04 03:07 AM by mitchum
don't have any money left to fund Ralph's vanity parade (after you blew it on the Vermont grifter)

Blanket condemnation meet blanket condemnation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Wrong target
Try instead: Dean, Clark, Lieberman, Gephardt, Moseley Braun and Graham supporters have less to fear from Nader because, well, they're arguing over who really coulda woulda won the elections next November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. You're not my type.
Nader sleeps with oil companies. I won't sleep with those who are comfortable with using right wing money to screw with the effort to send Dumbya back to his Crawford pig farm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
51. Rot in Hell Nader
cause you have brought hell to this country by putting in chimp! :grr: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. nader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 21st 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC