|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Bullet1987
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:01 PM Original message |
Don't Look Now...But Obama Just Won Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progress And Change
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. or the media coronation may backfire like the Gore endorsement of Dean... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Like the media coronation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I'm glad that the MACHINE POLITICS of Bush and Clinton are finally being spurned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ytzak
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Bush lost in 1992 because of Ross Perot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Perot's support cut both ways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. He couldn't take equally. Where do you get that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 07:10 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Not equally, but close enough to not be the REASON Clinton won. The RW claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. Equal percentage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Nope - polls showed it wouldn't have made a difference. It's a myth of the RW that Perot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #23 |
48. That's not true. Exit polling of voters showed that Clinton would have won without Perot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe we should just elect Oprah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeFleur1
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
57. Cut the Middleman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. He just needs to hold his own in the next few debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Well, we all know how that goes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. Gotta keep pouring hype into the tank |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. AHAHAHAHAHA hahahahahahahaha.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not necessarily, but it's clear the hunger for change is immense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. Hunger for Change is a foreign concept here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. NObama for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. In the same way that Hillary won it a month ago, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. I certainly like him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. That's the attitude that denied the White House to Gore. Instead, we elect a jerk. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. That had nothing to do with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 07:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. He didn't win his home state. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
11. "Don't Look Now...But Oprah Just Won Iowa" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
13. Last I heard that actually required Iowans to caucus and vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
14. If Oprah is all it takes, I really fear for this nation. I hope the people of Iowa are a little less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Sadly that seems to be all it takes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
38. Yes it's true ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #22 |
51. I've Said This Before Or Quoted It... Jackson Browne Wrote & Recorded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. My thought exactly. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. Oprah is not the strategy, and certainly not "all it takes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Lying, pandering, preaching, pussyfooting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #30 |
53. Oprah is not the strategy?!? - perhaps but for Obama supporters she's a blessing now and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. What Skip said!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Gardener
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #14 |
47. Give us a little credit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. Or a Bigot back lash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Wonder when the last time Iowans heard so many references to MLKing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. So, what, white guy references only? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Wow! Such conclusion jumping! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Right. All Iowans are bigots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Says you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. So, Iowans ARE bigots? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #41 |
49. You think there aren't bigots in Iowa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Point a finger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Huh??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
59. What about Iowa's past has to do with bigotry? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
44. Actually as an Iowan I hear references to MLK somewhat regularly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #44 |
58. I've always found it a challenge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. He's already there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phillyliberal
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. yeah well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
27. Wow...I'd never have the guts to post anything that...bold... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Sat Dec-08-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
33. he he he he he he he he this stupid post doesn't deserve a ha ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totheleft
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
45. Wow...thats.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
46. Oprah was impressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
50. Yeah, leading in the polls ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
55. The other side gets to play too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
56. Surprisingly even Bill Crystal on FOXnews said Obama would win Iowa this morning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-09-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
60. Oh, is the caucusing over? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Apr 28th 2025, 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC