|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:42 PM Original message |
Damn. John Edwards did Corporate Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. desperation time for the Bots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Well, thats a reasoned defense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. A perfect match for a "reasoned" attack..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #33 |
59. As JE would say..."It's Silly Season" ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
47. Yep. He's risen to the top when the Bots start firing (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. The minds of Babes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
48. Yep. HILLarious. Absolutely (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. When Clerking for a Judge after Law School, most cases are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Hey, quit picking on Wal-Mart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
34. Oh, poo... you're going to stoop to the facts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. Oh how awful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Yes, but I'd bet you don't repeatedly claim to have been working for The People "all my life." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Show me a candidate who doesn't puff up his resume a bit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
35. Orrrrr, you could read #3, and actually understand the facts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
62. Making fun of a person's regional accent is so progressive, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. Oh, no! You must be hiding some skeletons in *your* closet, too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #37 |
60. Hands to cheeks in astonishment back at you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Hey, don't forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandyd921
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
8. and...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. You don't even agree with "Hillary's centrist views; just want to be on the winning team?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
11. Are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
12. Rose Law Firm in the 70s represented WalMart, Tyson Foods, Worthen Bank... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. Right?! what a dumb argument from a hill supporter to talk about edwards law career. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
14. That is how many civil lawyers learn the trade in the early years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. No problem with his history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Edwards best work was as an ambulance chaser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:33 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. "Ambulance chaser" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmudem
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:44 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Great post JD!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
40. "Ambulance chaser" is the RW term to get people to give up their rights, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
45. very well said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
49. Thank You For Clarification!! Seems SOME People Are Getting A Case Of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Those cases look like a plus for edwards in my opinion. He was a damn good laywer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. "Ambulance chaser": rightwing slime word for someone who gets $ from corporation to victim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. it disgusts me when i hear democrats use that type of language vs. edwards. they're so ignorant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. Yep. This smear tactic backfired on the repukes bigtime... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaptBunnyPants
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
57. Shame on you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
63. Edwards won important cases that protect consumers. That's what Democrats do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bozita
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Helluva post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 08:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
58. Thanks for the excellent explanation JD ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
16. A lot of lawyers cut their teeth in firms like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
20. don't vote for FDR, either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Being dead for more than sixty years is reason enough for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. Barack goes into community work and than civil rights law. Edwards goes corporate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I don't think that this bothers Edwards supporters at all, in fact..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Just like Obama supporters forgive his pandering to bigots and throwing gays under the bus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Correct......just like Edwards supporters can rationalize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. FrenchieCat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
25. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
29. Hillary was a corporate lawyer too. So what? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
50. Bingo. Good Moniker, bytheway, ShadesOfGrey (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
36. I like him better now that I know he was a corporate lawyer for awhile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
38. Good find, NH. I clearly remember someone claiming how he didn't do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
41. Please, Please, Please DON'T TELL ME HE WAS ON THE WAL*MART BOARD FOR YEARS AND DID NOTHING ABOUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. Bwahahahaa! Touche. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
44. It's just wiki - the Edwardians will edit out "corporate" soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snotcicles
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
46. I'll bet if you dig real deep you'll find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 06:44 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. AND he Might Have A "Wide Stance" Too!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor.
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
53. "And once, when he was in high-school, he bought a subscription to Reader's Digest!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. And with a coupon in one edition, he sent away for a H-U-G-E house! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
54. Corporate law - 4 years. Defending the people - 20 years. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
55. My god! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemKR
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
56. becoming like obamanation n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed May 21st 2025, 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC