Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Underestimating intelligence isn't very smart (majority like C students)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 10:38 AM
Original message
Underestimating intelligence isn't very smart (majority like C students)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/shapiro/2004-06-08-hype_x.htm
Underestimating intelligence isn't very smart

<snip>For the past half-century, the Democrats have nominated a series of presidential candidates who were portrayed as boasting glittering intellectual pedigrees, most notably Pulitzer Prize-winning author John Kennedy and Rhodes scholar Bill Clinton. The Republicans, from Eisenhower to George W. Bush, have come across as the party of seemingly indifferent students who were shaky about facts but secure in their values. The personification of this GOP political tradition was, of course, Ronald Reagan.

During the quarter-century of Reagan's political career, Democrats continually repeated the folly of dismissing him as an ill-informed performer reciting someone else's lines. Early in the 1980 campaign, according to the National Journal, Jimmy Carter's image-maker, Gerald Rafshoon, drew up this list of Reagan attributes to be emphasized in TV ads belittling him: "untested, old, dumb, simplistic, actor, naive, inexperienced, Republican, right wing." The naive, simplistic and dumb actor carried 44 states to defeat Carter, a brainy incumbent president who had hyperbolically boasted that he was a "nuclear engineer." <snip>

There are many reasons for the Democrats' difficulties with cultural issues over the past quarter-century. But part of the explanation is that somehow the so-called party of the people became the party of meritocracy. Many voters, whose parents were part of FDR's New Deal coalition, discovered that anti-intellectual presidents like Reagan expressed their values and aspirations better than book-smart Democrats like Carter and Walter Mondale, who carried only his home state of Minnesota and the District of Columbia in the 1984 election.

Stevenson came to understand the enduring lesson that courting the intellectuals is not a road map for political victory. Democrats may not lionize "C" students, but such students sure outnumber and outvote the Rhodes scholars.


Comment: So how does Kerry sell idea/feeling that he has core convictions and that it is OK to switch leaders during a war. And should he focus on those convictions that look like they are "from the center" - and not from a fringe liberal who is a friend of/guided by that Liberal Teddy Kennedy - or is ABB solid enough to deliver 50+% of the vote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Check out Kerry's health care ad. Thats one core conviction
Attack ads by 527s like MoveOn.org might choose to focus on Bush's blueblood background and his fakery in playing one of the humble citizens of this country. They might also hammer home how many of Bush's "core values" he has sacrificed on the altar of political expediency and GREED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. You can be brilliant
And you don't even have to play dumb but you have to be able to somehow make people be able to relate to you. Clinton had that innate charisma. I fear that Kerry does not and I hope that he can play up his other strengths without alienating these people. The worst thing he could do is try to somehow try to emulate the folksy style that came naturally to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. in small groups Kerry is great w/ a natural folksy style -it is in large
Edited on Wed Jun-09-04 12:20 PM by papau
crowd speeches that he goes formal it seems.

Plus he has a problem stopping his mouth in interviews - always wanting to add another "on the other hand" comment - and that really kills him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Am I missing something here?
I'm reading "the so-called party of the people became the party of meritocracy." Where is the contradiction? Doesn't this mean that one gets ahead by one's merit -- a concept advancing fairness to all -- rather than by unfair advantages such as wealth, connections, or birth into the right family? Isn't meritocracy a concept that levels the playing field so that "the people" can get in the game? Isn't it better than oligarchy, monarchy, plutocracy, and just plain corruption?

Someone please tell me if I'm misreading this (3rd paragraph).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Feb 15th 2025, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC