|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 01:52 PM Original message |
MSNBC Veepstakes Update: Clark by 20% over Edwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. completely unsurprising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Nay, Nay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think you must have meant to say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sparrowhawk
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
31. You're not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
135. I didn't even vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 11:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
129. Some tend to be extraordinarily rude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 09:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
138. If there is any word that would aptly describe many Clark supporters here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Jumping to a conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. You put my thoughts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Null Pointer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
24. You hang around in Clarkie Circles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Let me know when you find one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Null Pointer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Sounds cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
136. How was the NYC event? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 06:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
124. Must be the difference in the North and the South |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 09:17 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. Nor here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 05:36 PM Response to Reply #126 |
134. Or there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. when it came to real ballot boxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Deleted message |
Doosh
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. talk about overstaying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Totally unsubstantiated RUMOR, doosh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Except for AZ, when Clark beat Edwards it was by a tiny margin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
125. It wasn't in TN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 09:22 PM Response to Reply #125 |
137. He is also forgetting New Mexico, and North Dakota.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Deleted message |
Kahuna
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. He did? He won one state. What are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Edwards got almost ten times the delegates (567 to 68) and 6 times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:01 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Uh, no he didn't win two states before dropping out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Meet our friend Mr. Reality: he won two states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:48 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. Deleted message |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:15 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. So what was the delegate count when Clark dropped out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:49 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. They were separated by 20 delegates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:53 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Why'd Clark drop out then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:58 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. because he was running against Kerry not Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. But edwards remained with the same (alleged) number of delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:13 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Why does it matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Deleted message |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. So you're just here to provide a public service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:19 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. What are you here for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:20 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. hmmm. thread about Clark as number 1 pick for VP on MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:20 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. Is this a discussion forum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:21 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Yes, have you got anything to discuss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Deleted message |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:24 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. wow, that's charming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Because it would have been stupid to stay in and spend the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
66. My opinion, take it or leave it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuLu550
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #66 |
95. well put, Tom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 10:34 AM Response to Reply #66 |
106. Taking your opinion, but adding my own refinements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 11:34 AM Response to Reply #106 |
110. A very friendly amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. Oh, Dean over Bush to be sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 09:15 AM Response to Reply #114 |
127. I never figured out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 09:58 AM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Interplay of corporate agendas and "lazy journalism" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLDHOME99
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 12:01 PM Response to Reply #128 |
130. your theory makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 07:31 PM Response to Reply #130 |
132. It was definitely a purposeful 'ignore'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLDHOME99
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 08:32 AM Response to Reply #132 |
150. That is certainly what Clark campaign volunteers thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #150 |
152. I think there are many things that can be factored... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLDHOME99
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 05:45 AM Response to Reply #152 |
153. no point in splitting hairs now . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 09:10 AM Response to Reply #153 |
154. By the way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLDHOME99
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #154 |
157. Don't you just love |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #157 |
158. Not only is he wicked smart... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLDHOME99
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #158 |
159. uh-oh . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. The brains are always the most attractive part of any man... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLDHOME99
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #160 |
161. listen to us, preaching to the choir -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 02:09 PM Response to Reply #161 |
162. INDEED! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLDHOME99
![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 03:17 PM Response to Reply #162 |
163. right back atcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 12:43 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. It was more than his being an unknown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Fri Jun-11-04 08:55 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. I noticed that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #54 |
69. Geez, after we lost AZ to Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:06 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. Oops. I checked. You're wrong. After TN/VA, Edwards 126, Clark 68. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
70. Deleted message |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:20 PM Response to Reply #70 |
76. The numbers speak for themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:22 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Great, then no one has to say anything else about them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #70 |
144. This is quite humorous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:25 PM Response to Reply #59 |
82. OK, but the difference in the relative delegate totals was not a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Hey AP - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Ditto! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:07 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. I"m not really saying anything other posting numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:10 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. But why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. But cosmo didn't seem to know the delgate count. Is it OK that I ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:15 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. No, I wouldn't.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. Post 23 is basically math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 08:30 PM Response to Reply #73 |
93. You didn't read my reply... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #64 |
72. See my reply post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:30 PM Response to Reply #55 |
84. annoying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Ok, OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 09:59 PM Response to Reply #25 |
139. He won THREE states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Flamebait posts are really boring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
32. Deleted message |
Adelante
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
35. Clark won once in 13 races; Edwards won once in 30 races |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Edwards won twice, actually. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. No, he didn't win twice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. His home state later rewarded him, as did Vermont Dean n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:06 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. AFTER he dropped... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:08 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. A win is a win. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. But is showing up Kerry a wise move? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. I seriously doubt Kerry cared. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #50 |
85. It's just that one of the criteria mentioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 11:10 PM Response to Reply #50 |
99. you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Precisely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 10:05 PM Response to Reply #51 |
141. Yeah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 10:02 PM Response to Reply #48 |
140. Notice the maneuvering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 11:47 PM Response to Reply #140 |
145. Matter unrelated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 09:49 AM Response to Reply #145 |
156. It's enough to get you eliminated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 10:11 PM Response to Reply #44 |
142. Great logic, cosmo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 12:12 AM Response to Reply #142 |
147. Actually, that is what you Edwards supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 01:28 AM Response to Reply #147 |
149. Yea Scoopie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 08:45 PM Response to Reply #147 |
151. These are the same folks, Scoopie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkySue
![]() |
Sun Jun-13-04 12:38 AM Response to Reply #42 |
148. Clark withdrew his name from the ballot in Arkansas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Mon Jun-14-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #148 |
155. Class all the way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
90. It would be more likely that a group with a PR firm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
94. Deleted message |
blackmoonlillith
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. The man is extremely bright and good looking as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sparrowhawk
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
33. He just gets better all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
97. check this one out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. How RUDE of you to assume such! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Deleted message |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Edwardniacs are just runnin' scared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 05:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
122. you bet your sweet pickles its gonna happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
14. AWESOME NEWS!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Brighter everyday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. It sure is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
60. How about some Samuel Adams? See here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:26 PM Response to Reply #60 |
83. Very good, cosmokramer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. So has... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
15. It is like clockwork really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. this post is one reason why there is such disharmony over VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Excuse me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Human nature will never change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 03:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. And "the attitudes of some (certainly not all) Edwards supporters"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Deleted message |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Flame bait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
47. I reported a valid news item... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 10:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
143. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MontecitoDem
![]() |
Sat Jun-12-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #143 |
146. pretty questionable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
34. Woohooo! Go Wes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 05:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Love the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
87. Just got mine today!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I just don't have the bones to spare right now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 08:41 AM Response to Reply #43 |
103. I get lots of compliments for it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 11:20 AM Response to Reply #103 |
108. who did the design work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 11:26 AM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Incapsulated designed and produced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 12:01 PM Response to Reply #109 |
113. What a terrific job! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
39. I think another reason for Clark's support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkamber
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
91. Problem with this poll... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 07:53 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. I see the advantage in that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkamber
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:57 PM Response to Reply #92 |
98. A reasonable response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 08:09 AM Response to Reply #98 |
102. Not a good reason, imo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 01:07 PM Response to Reply #102 |
115. Agreed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 01:20 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. One place Clark would be invaluable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 01:31 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. I appreciate your comments... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 01:37 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. I don't (completely) disagree, lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 01:47 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 03:59 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. Deleted message |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 05:27 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. and so it has some to pass... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithfulcitizen
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
96. WHOOOO-HOOO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmokramer
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #96 |
123. Of course they can't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
100. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jun-09-04 11:52 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Deleted message |
Leilani
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
104. Wow, I just got here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 09:03 AM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator
![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Please post questions about deleted posts in Ask the Administrators. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 11:38 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Sorry. Wasn't implying any moderator misdeeds... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator
![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun-10-04 11:53 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. No offense taken. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator
![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun-15-04 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
164. Locking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Feb 15th 2025, 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC