|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 09:59 AM Original message |
Giving Warren more attention than he deserves HELPS Warren get free press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. All Obama has to do is remove him and put someone who isn't a homophobe/bigot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. and who doesn't condemn a large % of the viewing audience to burn in hell, that's all. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Do you really think Obama will remove him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. I don't know if Obama will remove him. Right now Obama is hiding from the storm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Actually, for him and his presidency, that's very complicated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. He did it to Wright. After he said he never would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
36. Why would it be complicated? Think about it. What would happen if he removed him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Yep - easy as sweet potato pie! (Seriously, one simple statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
37. :-) Yep. He's the president. He doesn't *have* to have a hate-filled a-h in his inauguration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. I cant believe (lie, of course I can believe) that DU is still talking about this.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Neither can I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
29. Sure. Bc standing up for civil rights means you want the planet and economy to die. Riiiigt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. Ignoring things makes them go away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Precisely my point... now more people know Warren... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. But you think that having Warren headline the most historic inauguration in history, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. No, Obama is going to headline the inauguration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. So if Warren's 1:23 invocation is so important, then Lowery's benediction will be equally important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. but Warren's invocation will overshadow Lowery's because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. Perhaps you aren't familiar with Reverend Lowery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. You must be really pissed off at Obama then for elevating this dangerous man to national prominence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NWHarkness
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
8. Silence is acceptance n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Bumper sticker mentality is cute, but it doesn't fully address the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NWHarkness
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. You focus where you want, I'll focus where I want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. my sentiments exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
16. The world will get to see him for all his evilness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. What they'll see is a guy like Obama legitimizing it, and thinking Warren must be okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Not only legitimizing it, but honoring him and thereby seeming to endorse his views. By raising our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. That is the certain downside. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
45. What will they think when they see Rev Lowery speak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
18. Fun huh... and we're no better either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
19. more attention ---> more interviews for him to say incendiary shit ---> more outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
22. I think your subject line just proved the principal reason Obama's decision was dead wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Barack's Merry Christmas, present to Rick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lwcon
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. Ugh, perhaps my least favorite line of argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
26. I think the Inaugural Invocation surpasses any other "free press by DU opinions" RW might be reaping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
27. Warren has already had a ton of publicity, most of it catering to him. Now, he is getting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
31. I remenber the same thing being said about Sarah Palin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
32. yes. we should all just remain forever silent about bigots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
33. why are you blaming us instead of blaming Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
38. Welcome to GD-Rick Warren: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hiz higher profile also affords us the opportunity to vilify him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Actually if you watch him, he's all over the place on his opinions about gays |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Balderdash
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. The more I read your replies the more it becomes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. No one is telling you to be silent about Warren. NO ONE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. whoa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Ummm, ok, well. Ah, lemme no when ya figger out the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. circular firing squad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Play whatever talking point mind games ya want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Americas
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 12:39 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Ahh, my bad. Didn't see where you were going with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
40. Dare you to read this - Do you really think this will get on the MSM? Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
43. Sorry but I disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
44. You got that right...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
47. Doing the invocation = Less attention for Warren? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
48. No one at the DU can possible "give Warren more attention" than Obama did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
51. Warren has a huge, self-sufficient PR apparatus. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
55. Yes, of course, we should sit down and be quiet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Feb 14th 2025, 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC