|
No one investigating this stuff for MLB has subpoena power; what they can do amounts to a series of polite questions. Any lawyer representing a questioned player - especially a player like Bonds, who has actually testified under oath on the matter - is going to tell his client to STFU, lest he offer testimony that may tend to contradict previously offered testimony under oath.
Beyond that is the idea of some kind of penalty phase. Without subpoena power, any 'revelations' are going to be anecdotal and without teeth. Should Selig choose to, say, ban Bonds for a year after gathering information, that ban will go to arbitration, the courts, and will be vigorously opposed by the union. Ergo, any ban won't be upheld.
It's a show.
Oh, PS, the former Senator running the investigation has a financial stake in an MLB team, and is an officer with the Disney Corp, which owns ESPN, which is about to do a Bonds reality show. Nah, no conflicts here.
|