Republican candidate Mary Maxwell (whose website is maxwellforcongress.com) pointed out that Congress has more than sufficient legal means to tackle any suspected wrongdoing. "One way is to use its subpoena power to get sworn testimony. Another way is for Congress to flex its muscles against US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales by threatening to impeach him for shirking his duty. Yet, with one or two exceptions, our elected representatives won’t help us with 9/11," she remarked.
A third way to use the courts regarding 9/11, suggested Maxwell, "would be for persons to file a civil lawsuit requesting damages for injury or economic loss they suffered. As to whether the plaintiff has ‘standing’ to sue, this is often subject to a judge’s discretion. Hence, people go judge-shopping for a judge with a reputation for creativity," she said.
"And then there is the availablity of military law," Maxwell added. "Ibelieve at least two Air Force officials must have played a part in 9/11 and they could be court-martialed. That would not require the say-so of the US attorney general. I‘ve seen a video on Youtube.com in which retired US Army Maj. Gen, Stubblebine says emphatically ‘No plane hit the Pentagon.’ Isn’t that a sufficient statement to start an inquiry within the armed services?"
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/9/prweb432737.htm