|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Philosoraptor
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:12 AM Original message |
Did Afghanistan attack us? I did not know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. The invasion of Afghanistan was also illegal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Tue Jan-02-07 04:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
46. Which law was broken? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Tue Jan-02-07 06:35 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. I don't know if I would go so far as duly endorsed... more like turning their back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
2. 9/11 101 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 09:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Per the official 9/11 conspiracy theory that evidence shows to be bunk.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. The way I see it there are different levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. bush's business ties and personal ties to the bin Laden family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. Not to mention the Saudis had part of the report redacted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 08:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. 26 pages I believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. Afghanistan may not have attacked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 08:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. But the governing power of the USA also protects those affiliated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
36. I agree the close affiliation of Bush with the Saudis is very disturbing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
19. How do you know Al Qaeda had anything at all to do with 9-11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. If you'd like to really present some good evidence to support your claims... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Well, CNN told you that's what the tape of 'fat OBL' said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Tue Jan-02-07 09:13 AM Response to Reply #25 |
49. What claim did my question make? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Fine, maybe "Al Qaeda" wasn't responsible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. They spent some time in Germany too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Tue Jan-02-07 07:12 AM Response to Reply #37 |
48. Don't forget the flight schools in Florida! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
4. For whatever's it's worth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Afghanistan was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. A case can be made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 08:04 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. The options |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pretzel4gore
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. there's no bin laden... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Don't feel sad, we have them where we need them, in our sights..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. While I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 09:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. We have NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I can remember |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Amen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. At my age |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 09:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. The Taliban offered to hand over Bin Laden to a third party and the US refused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
38. Exactly, the invasion had nothing to do with 9/11.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Good post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. Good post Cali |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
17. At the time I reluctantly supported the invasion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
22. The Taliban had taken up residency in Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oblivious
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. The Taliban were not behind the 911 attack. There is not the slightest proof of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Indeed, even those who believe it was not orchestrated by BushCo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
39. The Taleban??! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. They were harboring Osama bin Laden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AliceWonderland
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
27. Guardian UK: Taliban offered to hand over bin Laden to a third party in October 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
29. Anyone who thinks it was okay to bomb that country due to the actions of its unelected rulers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
31. Cheney offered the Taliban money and riches if they let Enron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Bush's Opium Boom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. And now opium output from Afghanistan is number one in the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
33. Afghanistan itself certainly did not attack us, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Where is your proof that OBL attacked us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Mon Jan-01-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
34. Only if you're a rightwingnut. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philosoraptor
![]() |
Tue Jan-02-07 04:46 AM Response to Original message |
45. --------- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jul 26th 2024, 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC