Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You know what's always kinda bothered me about wildfire media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:17 PM
Original message
You know what's always kinda bothered me about wildfire media
coverage?

I just heard Anderson Cooper say, regarding the Malibu fire, that the flames are burning some of the most expensive homes in the world.

Reporters/anchors always seem to dwell on the fact when pricey homes are in danger or burn.

You never hear them say, "Tonight, dozens of moderate priced homes are in danger."

Why is the price of the house relevant?

It's tragic to see ANYBODY'S home burn.

If anything, it should be less of a big deal when expensive homes burn because theoretically, these are people who can easily afford to rebuild.

I've never understood why affluent homes are made out to be seemingly so much more important.

But that's just me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Same reason why no one cares when Joe Lunchbox and Suzie Homemaker get divorced...
But Hollywood couples? Or Donald Trump? Stand back! Media frenzy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think there's a certain smug satisfaction in play
"Oh, look, Mel Gibson's house is burning down. Pity."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I see (and agree with) your point, but one nice thing to note:
locally at least no distinction is made when houses are in danger from wildfires. We have several fires a year here in Arizona and whether it's a $3.5 million dollar house or a $25,000 pre-fab home, it's covered equally here. Maybe on a national level it's just the celebrity angle that draws the "interest" - or maybe Anderson just ran out of things to say, who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Where I live, I hear reporters and anchors harp on
expensive neighborhoods during wildfires, and we're not talking about celebrity homes.

These are just "regular" neighborhoods, where rich people happen to live.

I realize that expensive homes and inexpensive homes will be covered equally when all is said and done.

The news is going to focus on whatever has burned or is threatened.

I just don't understand why the value needs to be pointed out.

When I see people weeping over the loss of everything they owned, I never say to myself, "Hmmm, I wonder how much their home was worth?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're right. A loss is a loss, period. And, no, the value isn't important.
Honestly, I'm more upset when I see someone in a less expensive home that's been threatened or caught fire because I figure they may be in less of a position to bounce back. I realize I'm making assumptions, but based on my own life, I worry that they may not have enough insurance and/or other resources to help themselves out. Plus, let's fact it...those homes in Malibu may not be their only home...it may just be a beach house! (That's not to say I don't feel bad for those in Malibu - don't get me wrong)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Absolutely. Lets face it, it is more sad to see a middle class
family lose everything they own, for the reasons you mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Good point. Local news here routinely mentions "x structures have been destroyed",
w/out much mention of the relative price or such. Locally we hear more about wildfires than often makes the national news, and the Malibu cachet means more in the national press than here, fire-wise. I don't think it's that big a deal, but I see the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's the difference:
On the national news it's "BREAKING NEWS". But if it were average priced homes, it would be "DEVELOPING STORY".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 02nd 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC