Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman says he will filibuster WITH REPUBLICANS over Iraq escalation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 02:54 AM
Original message
Lieberman says he will filibuster WITH REPUBLICANS over Iraq escalation
Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent Democrat from Connecticut, is breaking with Democrats over President Bush's plan to increase the number of American troops in Iraq. Lieberman supports the plan, saying that withdrawing troops would be a recipe for failure. Melissa Block talks with Lieberman...

BLOCK: Can you imagine a scenario where you would join in with a Republican filibuster to stop the resolution, if it comes to that?

SEN. LIEBERMAN: I can because I think that it this is this important.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6923802

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. traitorous opportunist. With McCain falling and Joe as his lapdog, how long does he have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fucking NPR, he got elected as an INDEPENDENT
Why can't no one state that? That burns me up to no end. :mad::grr:

LIEberMe is an effing disgrace. I'm deeply ashamed that I live in a state that voted for this pig. We tried to warn people. We knew this would happen. Not for a minute did I buy his sudden anti-war stance. He's a phony, a liar and an egotistical, bloviating loon who deserves nothing but shame for what he has done.

I'm sorry America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. sorry...
I hated seeing him elected too. I'm sure you tried so hard for us all, thank you!

so many people just don't give a shit, and THIS is what they get for their ignorance.

can he be repealed out by emergency vote? surely those that care in your state are fuming.


www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<-- antibush prodem stickers/shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
39. I want to know too? Can Zell Lieberman be recalled? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. It's not your fault
Joe will have his day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ribrepin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. If the SOB does this, we need to have DU posting the names of any pundit
who calls him a democrat. He was elected as an Independent and he should stay an Independent. When some Chucklehead pundit calls him a democrat, we should pound them with E-mails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
38. If you find that Jennifer girl who suddenly feels ashamed for voting for him ...
... please punch her in the face for me. Thanks.

:hi:

I'm normally not violent but that's just the last straw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. LIe-beran has so much goddam blood on his hands. It's
fascinating he finds a way to sleep peacefully at night knowing he's teamed up with a bunch of killers.

Totally despicable.

I cannot believe this is the same person I voted for in 2000. What a creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Did you know the HRC endorsed him over Lamont? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yes, I realize HRC is far from perfect. However, the organization does a lot
of good when it comes to human rights, and until something better comes along, I'm will continue to offer my support.

After all, I don't necessarily approve of every Democratic candidate, but I support the Democrat.

That's the way I voted in November.....a straight Democratic ticket, even though I held my nose for a couple of people.

There's no perfect organization or candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. LIEberman wasn't the Democrat in that race. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Link ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. For a moment there, I thought you meant the Hillary Rodham Clinton n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. Hillary fully supported Lamont when he won the primary...
so your statement isn't entirely true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. The poster meant Human Rights Campaign...
Edited on Sun Jan-21-07 03:33 PM by Zhade
...one of the most corporate-friendly equal rights groups there is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. He will always be remembered as the Benedict Arnold of the 21 century
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. His high-mindedness is so far up his ass, he doesnt know up from down.
However, his pocket and bank account do manage to sort out his real agenda: Me. Me. Me.

Why cant he come out as the Republican he has always been and still is?
Me. Me. Me.

Hes playing both sides because there is no money too good or too dirty, just as long as it enriches him and his neo-con bruders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Brownnosing Bush so hard he flosses Georgie's back teeth. nt.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Link?
Why is this dual loyalty thing always used as a motive for Joe?

I think it's obvious he's an ass hole regardless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. I agree 100% with you
Firstly, his views do NOT represent Israel; they do go along with a subsection of Israeli views: the Likud. Not all Israelis support the Likud and related parties, and many think that the Likud and Bush approaches are disastrous for Israeli security. Just as not all Americans love Bush!

Secondly, there are plenty of right-wing, neo-con types who are prepared to support Bush. Nothing to do with 'dual loyalties'. The right-wingers who supported Pinochet and Botha did not (mostly) have dual Chilean or South African citizenship. Blair and his colleagues are very much like Lieberman in many ways (imperialist, warmongering Bush-poodles who betrayed a left-of-centre party) and I never heard that Blair or John Reid or Geoff Hoon or David Blunkett had Israeli citizenship. Or even American citizenship, given their support of Bush!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. joe was in on the planning stages of the war
check this out:
"In 2002, Lieberman became an honorary co-chair, along with George Shultz and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, an advocacy outfit spearheaded by a number of neoconservative stalwarts, including Jeane Kirkpatrick, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Richard Perle, James Woolsey, and Eliot A. Cohen. According to the group's mission statement, The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq was formed to promote regional peace, political freedom, and international security by replacing the Saddam Hussein regime with a democratic government that respects the rights of the Iraqi people and ceases to threaten the community of nations. "
(emphasis is mine)

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/3357

"The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq (CLI) was set up in late 2002 by Bruce Jackson, a director of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and former Lockheed Martin vice president. Shortly after the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, CLI closed shop, announcing on its website: Following the successful liberation of Iraq, the committee has ceased its operations. "

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1458

check out this website--there is a ton of stuff on here:
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/?sort=title_tagline#gov


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. He is a Repukelican....
and no one should be surprised that he would side with the thugs. But, good luck with that filibuster, we will just hand you your ass some other way.

PS: We are DONE with the fucking-up of the middle east!! They all need to check into reality, its really quite nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. This is stupid
His statements and actions with regards to Iraq are inline with the majority of republicans. Are you saying they all have dual identities?

I don't believe he "counts the best interest of America as his number one priority", but frankly I don't with many politicians and especially a majority of republicans in recent years.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Dual citizenship is iffy, certainly
It's worth questioning, whether politicians and public officeholders, and high level advisors should be allowed to have dual citizenship. Personally, I don't think they should. I agree it's a conflict of interest for policy makers.

The problem in this case, is people are asking whether Joe is strongly supporting the war, solely due to his religious affiliation. Also, when people speak about his strong support for Israel, they neglect to note that a majority of congresspeople who are NOT Jewish have similar, if not EXACT records with regards to Israel and the Middle East. Are we now going to say they all have dual identities? After all, there are maybe THREE republican Jews in Congress.

Why aren't people asking the same of say...John McCain, another strong proponent of the "surge"? Oh, wait could it be because he's not Jewish?

It could just be that Lieberman supports this surge because he's a spiteful ass hole war-mongerer...and that has little to do with his religion. Now, I'm not saying his support for the war has nothing to do with his strong support of Israel. It probably plays a part in the thought process, as it has for many neo-cons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
57. Also, it doesn't sound like real 'dual citizenship'
Farrakhan said in the quote that I read that 'as an Orthodox Jew, Lieberman has dual citizenship with Israel'. In fact, Orthodox Jews don't have dual citizenship. What all Jews - including anyone, Orthodox, Reform or atheist, who has a Jewish mother. - do have, is the 'right of return'. Israel has to accept them if they wish to go and live there. That doesn't mean they have an Israeli passport, or any right to vote there, etc., unless they do move to Israel. It's not the same as dual citizenship. (I should know, as I have both the right of return, as the daughter of a Jewish mother, AND dual British/Canadian citizenship, and they are very different things.)

And the right of return is an Israeli law concerning all Jews, not something that individual Jews choose to have. Therefore, bringing it up against a Jewish politican IS anti-semitic. It reminds me of nothing so much as our own racist Tory politician Norman Tebbit's bringing up the 'cricket test' for British Asians' loyalty to Britain: suspecting that they might root for India or Pakistan against Britain in a cricket match, and that this implies some form of disloyalty.

I have distrusted Joe Lieberman probably for as long as anyone here. To be precise, since 1988, when as a strong Dukakis fan I followed the American elections closely from here, and noticed that Lieberman won his seat by running against his Republican opponent from the right - something that seemed (and still seems) to me incompatible with being a Democrat. I didn't like Gore choosing him as his running mate in 2000. I detest him now. I detest him even more because we've got too many Bush-poodles in our own left-of-centre party. But I won't accept anti-semitic charges against anyone, and I consider this to be one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. Mr. Farrakhan is not exactly a worthy source
being that he is a notorious anti-semite.

Now, I'm not denying the possibility of Joe being a dual citizen, but I would have expected to hear a lot more by now if that were in fact the case. I'm sure, we would have heard a LOT about that in '00 being that he was running for VP.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. And I did not quote him necessarily as a source, but, instead, on purely a historical note
Edited on Sun Jan-21-07 01:12 PM by Emit
And, if you reread my post, I include not only Farrakhan's comment but also a link to the fact that other sources denied Farrakhan's claim. It wasn't so much about who brought it up, it was about the fact that it was brought up. So, the point of my post is that the question remains unanswered. I did not find, for example, a response by Lieberman himself, or a statement from him denying Farrakhan's claim or explaining his citizenship status, although there might be one out there.

On a side note, the poster asked about dual citizenship. I see nothing wrong with asking that question. The post did not seem inflammatory in his question. I see no reason why it was deleted.

To your second point, I also put a link to Russert's interview with Farrakhan -- apparently, it was an important enough incident at that time to make NBC's network -- I have no idea if other networks carried it. However, Russert's interview dealt more with criticism of Farrakhan for being an anti-Semite for making the claim, and there appeared no attempt on Russert's part to investigate whether Lieberman did, in fact, have dual citizenship. Is our media not allowed to ask those kinds of questions? Can we not even have a discussion about that?

Lastly, the report that I linked to (http://www.cis.org/articles/2005/dualcitizenship.html )

offers an interesting discussion on the matter for issues concerning dual citizenship.

Edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harveyrunner Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
48. A little more worthy than Bush or Lieberman, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yojon Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
44. Is Farrakhan more faithful to the Nation of Islam than to the US?
He may not think of it in that way though..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'll say it again
Lieberman is the King Douchebag of Douchebags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. I caught the tail-end of this interview on NPR while driving
That part where he explains how he differs from the Democratic Party on national security matters. I need to listen to that again, as that is key to what is happening right now with the DLC and the party. His tone was arrogant, and he talked as if it were shameful or naive for Democrats to be anything less that hawkish on the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. Did the Clintons help Lieberman
by showing up to give him support. I am seriously confused re all these contradictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. The Clintons were sneaky about it. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
54. Clintons were VERY instrumental in helping Joe, as were other popular Dem lawmakers.
I don't think it's coincidence that Lamont's message had trouble getting out in the general election after Hillary Clinton's communications director went to 'help' him as her contribution to supporting Lamont.

Neither Clinton could make their way to Connecticut to campaign for Lamont.And Bill said PUBLICLY to Larry King that Dems wouldn't lose because they had two good Dems running.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. and his surprises who?
can't this asshole be recalled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. and there it is.
the moment we've been waiting to hear about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. I wonder if those people who voted for Lieberman in Connecticut are
proud of themselves for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. He is in love with this crime against peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
33. Is anyone surprised? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
36. What a Fresca!
I suppose this is why he ran as an "independent", proof he can think for himself.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
37. Just like George W. bUsh, Lieberman says FUCK YOU to 72% of America.
The 72% of America who OPPOSE bush's escalation.

That's good to know; thanks for admitting it publicly, Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
40. Remember this guy used to be opposed to filibusters
He was one of the ones who formed the fake "compromise" with Republicans to allow them to have all their judges. Now that the Democrats are in the majority however he suddenly is OK with filibusters again. What a traitorous hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. dang...you and I think alike n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
41. History lesson
Edited on Sun Jan-21-07 11:21 AM by Zodiak Ironfist
When Democrats were threatening to filibuster three ridiclously right-wing judges who had no concept of the Constitution, Joe formed a coalition with the pukes to end the filibuster. Everyone remembers the "gang of 14" who thought their party's principles meant nothing and that filibusters were a cheap political stunt.

Now Joe happily filibusters to protect an unpopular Republican president in a war that everyone hates.

And people STILL say he is a Democrat. He is an albatross around our necks.

Joe only believes in filibustes when the Democrats are in the majority. There is no better evidence that he is a mole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
43. What the hell was Connecticut thinking???????????????? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
46. Lieberman thinks Israel is the 51st state
and Iraq is the 52nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
47. This doesn't surprise me one bit. Bastard. What a loser. It makes me ill to think I voted for him
in 2000. I wonder what Al Gore thinks of Lieberman these days? Is he kicking himself in the ass too? I would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
49. Lieberman belongs underneath the treads of a tank in the war he loves so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
50. My highest hope for '08 (other than a Dem. Pres)...
... is that we pick up a couple more Senate seats. With a few more seats we no longer have to deal with this fucking traitor. The Repukes won't have him either because of his other positions.

He'll be a marginalized nothing. Won't even be in the news. To an arrogant fuck like him that's a fate worse than death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. History will revile this man
Not that he would care... but people will remember what he's done.

I often wonder what Al Gore was thinking. Why on earth would he have chosen such a person as his running mate. It was obvious even then who Joe Lieberman was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Some of us aren't waiting that long.
I heared (I think the figure was) 71% of REpublicans voted for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. People will also remember
Edited on Sun Jan-21-07 04:29 PM by depakid
All of the selfish and destructive things that Republicans- and their enablers have done.

I reckon historians will draw a line- right about 1981, when Reagan tore the solar panels off of the Whitehouse roof.

Revulsion is exactly what they'll see and feel beyond that line. Not that the likes of Joe or Hadassah Lieberman would care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
52. Yes, there certainly WAS a reason we didn't nominate him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
55. People of Connecticut - RECALL LIEberman ...



BE THE BU$H OPPOSITION - 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
58. Well hell Joe, I knew were
meshuggener, but when you this past week broke your promise you made back in March 15, 2006 to seek subpoenas from the White House on their performance before, during, and after Katrina,I say, "shame on you" and "may this pain of shame force you to fear being exposed for who you really are."
Ben-David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stranger81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
59. Holy Joe is a sack of shit [eom]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 18th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC