|
Edited on Tue Apr-04-06 05:32 PM by DancingBear
This is how I thought it worked:
1) If a candidate in a Democratic primary is more progressive than the incumbent Dem (see Lieberman, Joe and Lamont, Ned) then it makes sense to work and vote for that particular individual.
2) If the DSCC or DCCC butts in to try and ram a candidate down the throats of the voters, it is OK to call them out and open that particular "tactic" up for discussion. It is also OK to donate to individual candidates rather then these respective "clearinghouses" if you believe that the road being taken by Howard Dean is the correct path to returning the Democratic Party to its core beliefs.
3) When the primaries are over, and a candidate is chosen, even if it is not your particular candidate, and even if you strongly disagree with his/her positions, then you are obligated to invoke rule 4, which clearly states:
4) Consider the alternatives!!! Pull the (D) lever so we can get the damn House and Senate back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Am I missing something here???
Regards,
bonehead, user of some series exclamation points
|