|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 09:09 PM Original message |
Now right-wingers are 'gunning' for Holder because he supported the Brady Bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Is there any nut like a gun nut? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalNative
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. No there really isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. How Bush of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
17. They're certainly the most tedious type |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. well, they need to get worked up over at least one nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I am worked up over him too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. Holder should be asked about it because many Democrats have moved away from gun control ala 1994 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Wed Dec-17-08 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. If the right-wingers can manage to derail Holder's nomination, I'll be grateful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Agreed. Derail him. Please. Be my guest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:20 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Do you have a better candidate? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 01:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Great. So who might be preferable? Inquiring minds... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:19 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. crickets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:20 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Yes, and it wasn't even a stupid question! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 09:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Pardon me, but I just got home from working a 10 hour day. I don't actually live on DU, I have maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:22 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. WHO would you suggest, sw? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. See my post #22 above. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:49 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Oh really....there's nothing like a RWer BS torpedo of a cabinet position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Whose side am I on? Not on Eric Holder's. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
13. Obama shouldn't have put Clinton people in his cabinet.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Who else would he get with some sense of how things in government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:23 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Should he have hired Chicago hacks? Who might be better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
19. I think what needs to be understood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
20. Methinks the blogger or someone else confused the Brady Bill with the much-hated Feinstein law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
21. I'm okay with the current NICS insta-check system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Feb 09th 2025, 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC