|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
FSogol
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:42 PM Original message |
In the Franken/Coleman recount they just allowed a vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogneopasno
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. That drives me up the wall, though -- why do people think they can do that to their ballots? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Humans just aren't very good at following directions. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kirby
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Why doesnt the machine reject it and the poll worker require the voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
24. They didnt fold, spindle or mutilate the ballot.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. Why let it get to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'd say that shows intent nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kirby
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Did the voter check the box AND do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes, it was correctly marked for Franken. The challenge was that the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kirby
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Why would they challenge that then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Someone offers you $20 to vote for Franken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. and another one that is Al's vote but next to Obama it said "NIG" with a vote for McCain n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Nasty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. the star tribune site has coleman at +108....er now +106... droppin like a rock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. 100 now! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. with about 400 to go thru. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. amazing to be able to watch it live. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Love Bug
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Yep. Get ready for the screeching once Al take the lead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Oh, I'll bet my schadenfreude-meter will be pegged!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. +94 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. +94 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. 90! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. Did he fill in the ovals with smiley-faces, too? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
19. The number to watch is actually on this page...Franken is the PROJECTED WINNER BY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kirby
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Coleman is now claiming 150 votes were double counted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Yeah, about that, oops...no Katherine Harris...no Ken Blackwell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
26. Coleman lead down to 71! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. 69! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
28. Not as funny as "Flying Spaghetti Monster" for Soil Minister |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
29. 46/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
30. 27! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Feb 10th 2025, 06:04 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC