|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:36 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you support the rights of LGBT citizens of the United States to be legally married? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. I support civil rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. Yes they deserve to be as miserable as anyone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #70 |
79. Absolutely. All consenting adults should have the opportunity to experience the joy of divorce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. I support civil rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:41 PM Original message |
but marriage affords more rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
33. Well make them the same just don't make my homophobe neighbor have to share his marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. so you support civil unions for gay folks as long as it isnt called marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. The back of the bus gets you where you're going, just like the front of the bus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. easy now mondo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. I think my statement was well deserved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
52. No I support whatever the gay community wants just as sure as if I was gay myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
74. You actually can't do that - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctaylors6
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #74 |
104. DOMA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:03 AM Response to Reply #33 |
84. Why would he have to share his marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Creideiki
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 03:20 AM Response to Reply #33 |
97. Translation: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celeborn Skywalker
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. I suspect any "no" votes you get are going to be pranksters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Or people attempting to justify their wild-eyed claims of homophobia on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. From the responses to the many threads about Warren, I doubt that all DUers support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_bryanto
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Or those people (like me) carping about that restaurant out in California, I suppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. You can doubt all you want. You'd be wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. I was curious as to whether any of them would be truthful n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. I'm an Obama-defender, not a Warren-defender, AND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
93. don't be too sure about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. Without hesitation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. Absolutely..n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. Without question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes, without equivocation...(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. I also support a constitutional amendment banning divorce amongst christians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'm doubting anyone will have the stones to click NO -- and identify themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. No, people think it's not a big deal because it's not a big deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
45. He's a symbol. And a signal. If it's not a big deal, why are so many upset, hmmm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolann
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:29 AM Response to Reply #45 |
89. Good for you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
15. I support Civil Unions for EVERYONE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. And what are you doing to acheive that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
67. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. I don't think that's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
16. The people of DU have spoken. 45-0. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. Worth a kick and a rec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
20. It's in the Consitution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Declaration of Independence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. Okay, "Declaration of Independence." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
66. And their slaves too, no doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:57 AM Response to Reply #66 |
96. I think it was property owning that was important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #20 |
61. It actually is in the constitution. Loving vs Virginia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #61 |
102. Thanks for the clarification! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
21. K&R, President-Elect Obama should not give a wink and a nod... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
23. Yes. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
24. Of course, why shouldn't gay people be miserable too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
26. anything less would be discrimination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
28. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kool Kitty
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yes, of course I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tama
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
30. Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. 100% Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
36. Other because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Government doesn't "sanction the religious rites of marriage". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. ok your stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Let's look at why you're wrong: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. You are right as far as you go but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. In other words, you misstated your case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_bryanto
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. Totally agree n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
68. How does your theory explain common law marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike 03
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
38. Unequivocally, and without hesitation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TlalocW
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
40. Yes, but you can't get divorced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. Yes, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
42. 100%! 'Marriage' as defined by the state is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
46. This is pissing me off more and more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
49. there should be no question about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
50. Sure. Of course. But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
54. Yes, I believe the First Amendment gives them the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarukaTheTrophyWife
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
57. The two bigots need to get banned from DU now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. See post #4. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarukaTheTrophyWife
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. I've seen people post plenty of times on here that they're against gay marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:06 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. thats why I posted the poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #65 |
76. Why don't you point out the homophobia? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarukaTheTrophyWife
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. Pointing out the posts is against the DU rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #64 |
75. I think I've seen two people here in the last year who were actually against gay marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
58. Yes! A thousand times yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
60. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatholicEdHead
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
62. Yes, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
63. Sure.. and divorce and re-marriage ad infinitum... equal is equal nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
69. I'm desperately trying to understand the logic of those who voted NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
71. As a matter of fact I do, Mari333. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
73. There wasn't an answer for me, even though I still clicked on one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
77. Of course. "Separate but equal" will not suffice, the XIV amendment covers all of us. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidneyCarton
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
78. Other. Marriage for LGBT citizens of the U. S. is inevitable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
80. Define support? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarukaTheTrophyWife
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
81. We're up to five bigots that need to be banned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Dec-18-08 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
83. You bet your sweet bippy I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
85. Yes!!! Of course! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
86. Hell to the yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qanisqineq
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
87. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
88. I'm against heteronormativity in all its forms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
90. Loudly, and with my time and money. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertoRoberti
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
91. No Marriage for Anyone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertoRoberti
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
92. The Biblical definition of marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sultana
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
94. YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
95. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
98. Yes, completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 03:25 AM Response to Original message |
99. "Equality under the law" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enigmatic
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 03:26 AM Response to Original message |
100. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
101. Yes, yes, yes, a thousand, a million, a billion, a trillion times yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
103. Yes, I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
105. yes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Feb 13th 2025, 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC