|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:10 PM Original message |
No one who works actively to limit anyone's human/civil rights should be part of the Obama team. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. limiting civil rights is a legitimate viewpoint. give the guy a chance. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. if we can't find common ground with bigots, who can we find it with? nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Really, it's THAT absurd. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. got the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I'll jump in and say that he was just making a sarcastic comment that agreed with yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Thanks, after replying, edited because I thought so but wasn't sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I believe the two posters are engaging in a bit of satire -- they support your point of view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Limiting civil rights is not a legitimate viewpoint. I am and will give him a chance since what else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Why are you trying to start a flame war in the thread of a member who agrees with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. yeah...what a flame war. bwaaahahaha. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. booboohead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justaregularperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't think anyone disagrees with you on this board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. I agree completely and the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is a basic civil right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Don't you mean Constitutional Right? there is a difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. No, I mean civil right, e.g., when a person's civil rights are restored after losing them because of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
16. Thank you. I totally agree. You've expressed it perfectly! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. K & R! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
19. As far as I know, no one fitting that description is part of the Obama team. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I went back and forth on what descriptive word to use, and decided on "team" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I believe Rahm Emanuel supports banning firearms and RKBA is a civil right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. No, he doesn't support repealing the 2nd amendment if that's what you mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Check On The Issues re Rahm Emanuel link below for his anti-RKBA actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 03:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. None of those votes are constitutional issues, as already clarified by the SC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Sorry but he supported the ban of handguns for self-defense. You can spin all you wish but the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Feb 07th 2025, 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC