|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:27 PM Original message |
Folks, I am really liking the Chu pick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Who's Chu. Sorry I missed that one. Solis! woohoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Energy Secretary nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. I love!!!! the sounds of him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Solis also. Yes. Hi, lonestarnot. Solis is a very good choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I am loving the Chu pick myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Hey. didn't know you were in the neighborhood but the neighborhood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. And energy secretary who believes in the pursuit of science |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. If I knew you were coming, I'd have baked a cake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. And this appointment is not bad either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Ah -- THAT Heinz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynicalguy1111
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 04:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
38. hes a smart guy according to wiki |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. He's not gay. Therefore Obama is a bigot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I'm pretty sure he's a boy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Ooopsy - thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
9. yah, science! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yes. Science, real and actual, and honored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 10:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. it's back baby! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
16. Chu and Hilda Solis make me very happy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Hey there. Welcome of the night of the Solstice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I read that winter starts at 6:04 am CST tomorrow....I'm ready.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:43 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. You're one of the good guys, Rowdyboy. You're right on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat Dec-20-08 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
20. OC, did you see my post about the NOAA lady? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 05:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Hi, Blue_In-AK -- thanks for providing the link to your thread -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yowzayowzayowza
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
23. All Obamaz technical picks have been impeccable. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
24. I had listened to one of his speeches and came away impressed as hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Hi, opihimoimoi. Yep. I plugged into some of those interviews and addresses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 09:30 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. The man is cutting edge on energy....a bit more than Sarah is, LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I imagine he has a Stanford office, although I'd have to hunt it down." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Thank you very much...I will make contact and see what happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Great. Would love to hear it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. rgr that :o) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
30. I'm really liking him too, my dear Old Crusoe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Hey there California Peggy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
32. KnR....just thought of something...his bio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 02:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. John P Holdren Link to Lecture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Sun Dec-21-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
33. This is a good pick by Obama! But still needs choices to limit corporate influence in government... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynicalguy1111
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 04:34 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. which scotus nominee would u elect to protect women's rights? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 05:51 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. The issue is that SCOTUS nominee should BOTH protect women's rights AND lose corporate personhood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 04:26 AM Response to Original message |
37. I had to research but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Dec-22-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. - - - - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Feb 06th 2025, 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC