Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tweety just said that the news got worse as the day went on yesterday for Elizabeth Edwards...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:53 PM
Original message
Tweety just said that the news got worse as the day went on yesterday for Elizabeth Edwards...
and that the prognosis is not good. Is that true?? What did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know details, but if it's stage 4 bone cancer,
the prognosis can't be good. I've lost several friends to this. It's awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Its breast cancer, not bone cancer
The cancer in the bone is breast cancer, not bone cancer.

I still agree that things do not look so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I'm sorry, you're right. Breast cancer met to rib bone.
Still poor prognosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Any cancer that is past Stage I...
...is VERY serious. Even Stage I cancer is bad news. I had NO clue that she was diagnosed at Stage IV. How very, very sad.

:cry:

That means, as I understand it, that the cancer has gone to other sites.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Stage 4, met to lungs, bones. And other organs. 20% survival rate 5 yrs post dx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yeah, that is about how I understand it , too.
Unforunately. The survival rate of Stage IV cancer is very low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I read that the stage 4 - 20% five year prognosis is based on
first diagnosis. She was not stage 4 in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Once she is formally dx with stage 4 she goes to that statistical category
in terms of prognosis. She doesn't keep the prior prognosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Yes, but LIZ might be saying that the Stage IV prognosis is dated from the original diagnosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Oh I didn't understand that point. Stage 4 prog would be dated from time of Stage 4 dx.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 08:24 PM by cassiepriam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure John and Elizabeth called Tweety the first chance they got and told him everything
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's kind of the opposite of what John Edwards said
He said the more of the diagnosis they heard, the more encouraged they were. Perhaps Tweety got it backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Right. That's what I thought. He is just an idiot. I should have known. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Hopefully....
...he got this completely wrong. He does get a lot wrong so this could be one of those things he shot his mouth off about without knowing the facts. Would not be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. God, I hope so. He really does say some stupid things sometimes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. I'm convinced that Rove sent the points - fair game. Normal people
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 07:56 PM by higher class
would be quiet. Considerate people would express best wishes. Political radicals who take orders will make her and them out to be horrible people. especially because the Edwards are the opposite - extremely intelligent to begin with which distinguishes them right from the starting gate.

If GE NBC keeps this up past the weekend, everyone will be able to judge for themselves.

GE = jugular - parallel to Rove.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. He did also say that all the tests weren't back yet.
I was under the impression that the jury was out still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought that they said that she could live with it for years. I thought maybe I missed something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. where`s that fuck`n cat when ya need one
so the edwards or their doctor told tweety bird the prognosis....ok.,i`ll buy that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. There was talk that the breast cancer may be in her lung also.
In any case this is not curable. It is only treatable to try to reduce tumors size. Everything depends on the aggressiveness of the cancer. It does not sound like she will live to a ripe old age no matter what they do. She was just trying to appear positive in the face of this horrible news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. She really is amazing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That is what I heard also
It is very sad and natural that people would go into denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. No, it's not curable
but no form of breast cancer is ever curable. All you ever get with breast cancer, at best, is to be free of it and manage to avoid recurrences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe Bill Frist saw her interviewed on TV, made a diagnosis, and called Tweety. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. He contradicted everything John and Elizabeth Edwards said yesterday
Did they call Tweety today and tell him something different? :eyes:

Bottom line is this: John Edwards is still in the race, so they obviously believe the treatment will work. If he drops out, THEN we worry. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I only wish that were so.
but stage IV cancer is always something to be worried about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I didn't mean to suggest that we shouldn't worry at all ... of course it's serious
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 07:24 PM by BattyDem
What I meant was ... let's not get even more upset because of Tweety's comments. Both John and Elizabeth have positive attitudes and they're remaining optimistic. We should do the same. He would never stay in the race if Tweety's information was accurate. The Edwards' have the facts about her condition and believe she will do well with treatment, so I'm going to believe in that as well. :-)


edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
24.  VERY CLEAR report, pessimistic..bad thing is also her initial diagnosis was only in 2004...
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 07:54 PM by Gloria
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvg/story?section=health&id=5145053



Local cancer expert weighs in on Elizabeth Edwards' recurrence

WTVG-- March 22, 2007 - Dr. Iman Mohamed is the director of the University of Toledo Breast Center. She says Elizabeth Edwards' doctor mentioned other small "suspicious" spots elsewhere in her body, possibly in the lung. She says when the disease spreads only to the bone, survival rates can be 10 to 20 years. But when there's soft tissue involvement, like the lung, survival rates are reduced to anywhere from two to five, or maybe six years.

But she says every patient is different, and there are still many different treatment options for Mrs. Edwards. "There are lots of good options. There is hope. Definitely, but people need to be realistic, and that's what we always discuss with our patients, we're very optimistic, but our feet are on the ground. We're not flying. We're very realistic as well."

Dr. Mohamed says she was concerned to see that Mrs. Edwards' first diagnosis was only back in 2004. She says the cancer coming back so soon suggests it is aggressive. The doctor says the goal with stage four breast cancer isn't a cure and to one day be cancer-free, but treatment that will allow a good quality of life for as long as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. thank you for this information. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 13th 2025, 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC