|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:24 PM Original message |
All Harry Reid really did in his "light-skinned" comment was acknowledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. There's no way to spin the use of the word "Negro" to a positive. Unlike many elderly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. He could have gotten "all sophisticated" and used the term "ebionics." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I missed the word "Negro." But this is a word Martin Luther King used, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Negro is not a slur...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Right. It comes from the Latin word for black, doesn't it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. It was what African-Americans and before that Blacks called themselves..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. What Clinton said was worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. All of this primary rehashing is being done to keep ourselves at each other's throat.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. If anything,if reflects how big the gap is between a race understanding another.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree, it seems that the (R)s either don'[t understand what racism is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. There's a much more important reason for dumping Harry Reid than this faux pas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I think the Rethugs are piling this on him right now to hurt him in the final push |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Could be a blessing in disguise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. How is losing our Senate Leader, and gaining a Republican in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. He's an icon of corruption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I think you have just described the Republican party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiva
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. You might want to educate yourself about Nevada politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. He can resign his leadership position without resigning his seat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. i'll k&r that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. Harry:" If thou thinkest twice before thou speakest once, thou wilt speak thrice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
18. Double Standards..What Clinton said was much worst.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 10:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Don't go there. The same book claims Obama wasn't as interested in poverty as Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 10:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. So if its a book of half truths, where's the fact checking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-10-10 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
23. Deleted message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu May 22nd 2025, 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC