|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Amerigo Vespucci
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:18 AM Original message |
Raw Story: Under fire, Obama’s chief of staff calls liberal strategy ‘fucking retarded’ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. Same to you, Rahm! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
2. Choice of words aside (yikes), I have never seen Republicans run ads AGAINST Olympia Snowe, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. Rahm's Cornered the Market on Idiocy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
4. Way to feed the beast, Rahm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. See, I like Rahm's no-bullshit manner of speech and his abrasiveness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. His statement strikes me more as immature and unprofessional than "no-bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. You're not going to the right business meetings :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. I'm in a biz where people swear like sailors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. I'll agree with you there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
35. Do you know anyone with mental illness? Was it the "retarded" or the f-bomb you liked? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
6. Turns out Rahm Emanuel is completely incompetent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
7. See ya at the polls in 2010 Rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
8. Rahm, our own personal kkkarl. He was wrong about Dean's 50 state strategy and it's been downhill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
9. What the fuck this was a statement said in august |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Hey, it's a Murdoch rag. If there's nothing to report today, they'll try to stir the pot anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
31. More red meat for the "left". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
36. But why do we need to hash it out here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belpejic
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
10. Keep thinking that Rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
11. The second I heard Rahm was COS, I knew we were fucked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. rahm is a neoliberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
13. Asshole.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
14. We see you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nevergiveup
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
15. Is this fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
16. Screw you, Rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
19. Go cheney yourself, Rahm! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
20. I guess we saw how failing to mobilize the base on the issue turned out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
22. Only to the extent they try to placate Republicans at the expense of everything else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
23. No. You know what is TRULY retarded, Rahm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newtothegame
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
24. This stuff is such a joke. Is this like the Bush beating his chest thing that everyone was all over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
25. And we're warning YOU, Rahm Emmanuel .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
26. Fuck Rahm and the rest of the corporate greedy little assholes in DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
28. Stay classy, Rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomKoolzip
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
29. What a disgusting choice of pejorative. May that discriminatory and insulting slur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
30. Rahm, you had me at "fucking". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
32. Fire Rahm. What an asshole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
33. If Rahm says it's bad, then it must be good. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
37. Is that because it might work or because you didn't think it up, Rahm? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova
![]() |
Tue Jan-26-10 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. pot ... kettle ... that covers it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon May 12th 2025, 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC