|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Union Yes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:19 AM Original message |
Tax firearm ownership similar to a property tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. Stupid idea. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
2. Too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
3. Sure. Also tax knives, baseball bats, rocks, pointy-toed boots, fists, bricks, 2x4s... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
4. Unconstitutional, politically foolish, and illogical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
5. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
6. If the money goes towards crime prevention, I'm in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
7. Nah. But they should treat gun owners the same way car owners are treated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Of course, in most states none of that is required to own a car on private property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Great idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Yeah, I've heard that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
8. Nah, just charge $100,000 tax per murder by gun. That'll fix everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
9. The attempt would fail and Democrats would lose congress. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
10. How about a tax on union membership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Oh, SNAP! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Already have that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Not to mention the new tax on their benefits coming in 2018. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 05:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. Thanks once again --always good to know how republicans think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
13. ...and you will be taxing LEGAL gun owners, not criminals who do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
14. Fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
15. How would they know who to tax without registering every gun owner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
16. Why not just make..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akwapez (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
17. So you want to encourage people to keep their firearms secret and off the books? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
18. I like the Constitution. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Then you like this part too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
24. It's dead Jim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. There is a registration fee here for every gun purchased from a legitimate source. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
26. Per capita guns are not an enourmous cost at all, nowhere close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
27. Uh, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
28. What about poin-ted stick? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conspirator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yeah. So that only the rich that already own your ass, can have their private armies? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 18th 2024, 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC