|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:48 AM Original message |
Three Junior High/Middle School Photos for Comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. Shouldn't today be labeled 1975? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's what I thought too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I was wondering about that myself! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. 1973. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Yeah. My mistake. I've edited the OP and added a photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libertas1776 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well, if "today" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texanwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think kids looked older back then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
6. Um, that "today picture" is actually 1973. That's 37 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. bah hahaha. kept thinking today didnt look like today. lol. i felt like a twilight moment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smokey nj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. 1973 was 37 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Seems like 100. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
9. Edited. My bad. The second photo is from 1970 something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
10. Is this a joke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ineeda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
11. No way is the 2nd picture "TODAY" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
12. This is what internets do---no one looks like a librarian anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. You need one for 2009 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. All one needs to do is look around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sense (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
16. the last pic is from 11 years ago..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
17. I see an increase in armlessness NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DavidDvorkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
19. The plural of anecdote is not data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
22. small sample size, difficult to interpret data.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatchWhatISay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
23. How strange that the male adult is stuck in the middle of the group in the 1973 picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomRain (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-03-10 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
24. Really poor form to place names here on that 3rd photo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Sep 18th 2024, 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC