|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:56 AM Original message |
The single regulation that would solve all mine safety issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. that is pretty radical . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. You could require that each and every officer spend an equal amount of time in the mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
protocol rv
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. Or one of his children will do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That assumes they love their children more than they love profit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
5. I like it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:07 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Let's send this idea to Alan Grayson and let him bulletproof it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
7. Sure, he will have an office 1 foot inside the mine, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Require them to directly supervise mining operations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. These executives know that most of them will never see a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Here's what motivated this post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. That assumes they know anything about mining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldlib
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
8. Excellent! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
11. OUTSTANDING suggestion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankeyMCC
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
13. Or maybe that all mines (and all dangerous industries) Must |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. NOW you're speaking my language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. I mentioned this the other day... it's a great idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. A modern canary in the coalmine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
16. We can do the same with oil execs and the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
17. Ha, ha... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. What I can imagine is Alan Grayson introducing some new legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. So |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Troop
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Hold On There! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Black Lapel Disease? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4lbs
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
24. No, just allow them to unionize. Support EFCA too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 07:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. 1974 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4lbs
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Yes. I'll take an accident at a union mine every 35 to 40 years over the once-a-year incidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
25. I'd ban coal mining. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 06:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Works for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. The mine operator will be charged with murder if a mine caves in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jul 26th 2024, 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC