Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SMOKIN' Pope? Lawyer says then-Cardinal Ratzinger "Handled Priest Case Quickly"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 03:09 PM
Original message
SMOKIN' Pope? Lawyer says then-Cardinal Ratzinger "Handled Priest Case Quickly"
Pope Handled Priest Case Quickly, Lawyer Says
By DANIEL J. WAKIN

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/world/europe/11lena.html?src=mv

ROME The future Pope Benedict XVI, dealing with a request to defrock a child-molesting priest in California, was handling it as a dismissal from the priesthood not an abuse case and acted expeditiously by the standards of the time, a Vatican lawyer said in a statement released Saturday.

The Vatican issued the remarks a day after reports emerged that Benedict, then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, signed a letter to the priests bishop saying the matter needed more time and that the good of the Universal Church had to be taken into account. It took six years for the man, the Rev. Stephen Kiesle, to be removed from the priesthood.

The bishop, John S. Cummins, wrote to Pope John Paul II in 1981, saying that the priest had been criminally charged with molesting six boys ages 11 to 13 several years earlier and that he was asking to be dismissed. He wrote to Cardinal Ratzinger at least three more times, to provide information and check on the cases status.

The lawyer, Jeffrey Lena of Berkeley, Calif., denied that a 1985 letter from Cardinal Ratzinger to Bishop Cummins showed him resisting pleas from the bishop to defrock the priest. Mr. Lena was quoted in the statement as saying that there was a rush to judgment going on here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
subaltern Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is that same sort of logic that Wall street bankers use to justify bonuses after crashing their
in that it makes sense to them but bewilders and angers everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 22nd 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC