Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On picking a candidate Justice for the Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 05:39 PM
Original message
On picking a candidate Justice for the Supreme Court
Many factors that should be considered have been discussed here and in the media; ideology, demographic representage, age, etc, but the most important factor is often never mentioned or considered; the ability to persuade.

While many in the liberal blogosphere are calling for the most ideological firebrand to be appointed this in fact would be a strategic mistake because the most important quality that the next Justice is their ability to persuade, particularly persuade Kennedy.

We are not looking for one sure but abrasive vote but one sure vote that is able to brink Kennedy along as much as possible.

The reason that those that are arguing for a 'firebrand' are arguing against their own interests is the same reason that Alito, Scalia and Thomas are terrible picks for the conservatives; these three have minimal impact on building majorities.

We don't want a 'leftist' Scalia that irritates his peers and gets ovations among the true believers, we want someone like Earl Warren who can deliver majority votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's to Pres Obama choosing
the best one for the job for the long haul like SCJ Sotomayer seems to very well be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought that was the rationale for Sotomayor? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. two points
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 06:05 PM by ruggerson
a) you're assuming that someone cannot be strongly to the left of center and at the same time, by temperament, be a consensus builder. I would posit to you that the two are not mutually exclusive.

b) Earl Warren was Chief Justice. The comparison is apples and oranges, as this opening is for an Associate Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. On your two points

a) Many here are not arguing for a persuasive person on the left, they want someone like Rep Grayson (or Justice Douglas) that is literally a 'firebrand'. But the more ideologically 'pure' a person is the less that they are going to be able to persuade people who are more interested in practical and nuanced considerations.

b) Of course EW was CJ. And of course that is why CJ have more influence than a regular justice. Now going beyond what everyone knows is the fact that Earl Warren was not a judge but a politician, and Obama has been talking about getting someone other than a sitting judge to be considered as a Justice. Earl Warren is the most well known example of a person who was able to use interpersonal skills to build majorities. Initially Roberts was seen as someone that was a coalition builder.

The basic point that a 'safe vote' (which is humorous in itself because anybody who is going to be under serious consideration for the Supreme Court in this era will have become experienced in camoflauing their more strident ideological opinions to stay viable) is not as important as someone that contributes to building coalitions and majority votes. We do not want someone like a 'Scalia on the left' that makes all of the true believers erupt in escasty when reading their seperate minority opinion we want someone who helps us write majority opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cheers!
I'll drink to that.

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, that ultra left Justice Ginsburg is a real liberal-ass irritant to the rest of the court.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 09th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC