Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Progress on Wall Street Reform? McConnell softening?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 05:21 PM
Original message
Progress on Wall Street Reform? McConnell softening?
I know, trust none of these bastids!

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_04/023430.php

SIGNS OF PROGRESS ON WALL STREET REFORM?.... Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) had taken the lead in trying to kill Wall Street reform. Today, on the Senate floor, he struck a less antagonistic tone, and there were signs of possible progress.

On Tuesday, McConnell returned to the chamber and announced he was "heartened to hear that bipartisan talks have resumed in earnest." Senate Democratic leaders are preparing to bring the overhaul bill to the floor as early as Thursday, but all 41 Republicans have signed a letter stating their opposition to the bill in its current form. Unless Democrats can peel off at least one GOP senator to allow debate to proceed, a GOP-led filibuster could block financial regulatory reform indefinitely. <...>

"I'm happy to hear my counterpart, my friend, Senator McConnell talk about the need for more negotiations," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.), in remarks on the floor following McConnell's speech Tuesday. "We don't stand in the way of that."


McConnell also told reporters today, "We believe the process to achieve {a bipartisan bill} has now been reconstituted. We are all confident that this can be fixed... Senator Shelby {the Republicans' chief financial reform negotiator} believes that there's been a very serious effort to re-engage."

McConnell said the progress is the result of his threats and the letter with 41 Republican signatures vowing to unanimously oppose the legislation. Democrats are suggesting the progress is the result of a) McConnell struggling to keep his caucus united; b) bad press after McConnell was caught blatantly lying; c) bad press after the secretive trip to Wall Street by GOP leaders; or d) some combination of all of them. ;)

Whatever. The point is, the effort appears, at least for now, to be gaining some ground in the Senate. In fact, Sam Stein reports that Republican Sen. Richard Shelby (Ala.), the ranking member on the Banking Committee, said negotiations "have progressed to the point that the debate now centers on specific language rather than individual proposals."

While McConnell specifically said just 48 hours ago that he wants to see senators "go back to the drawing board" on crafting the legislation, Shelby said, "We are not going back to the drawing board.
I have said all along that we are probably conceptually together on -- I've even said -- 85 percent... Now we are getting down to words and phrases."

If recent history is any guide, Republicans may very well be jerking Democrats around (again), and will decide to reject the proposal in its entirety after the latest round of talks, no matter what Dems offer in good faith. But, at least for today, there's evidence of some progress.

Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. in a nutshell...here's the entire point......
"If recent history is any guide, Republicans may very well be jerking Democrats around (again)..."


Sen. Harry, \Hey, why not show it! Such polished balls, you said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. McConell's gang got us all in this financial mess in the first place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. It wasn't all GOP. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Of course it was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe he just wants to be sure he can water it down in all the right places.
Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 11:23 PM by Dr Fate
We dont even need too much GOP support to pass a really strong bill- unless Blue Dogs just need them for cover.

Remember how hard the Blue Dogs fought to get the GOP on board with their idea of HRC? Turned out that Blue Dogs did not get to blame killing the PO on a GOP scape-goat after all. But this time is different-the GOP cant be seen as essentially pro Bail Out b/c of the tea-baggers. I'm just wondering if we are seeing somethign similar here. Time will tell...

The GOP will want to be part of this process-and the Blue Dogs will welcome them, but will it be for the right reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm looking for the Democrats to fold to McConnell's demands that the derivatives
part be removed from the bill. Then, president Obama would veto it as he promised if that part is not in the bill, making him look the bad guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. As long as Wall Street OWNS our legislators, there won't be ,,,
ANY substantial reforms. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. I bet the poll numbers on this don't look too good to Mr. McConnell. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 25th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC