Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

That wasn’t a prediction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 10:37 AM
Original message
That wasn’t a prediction

Posted with permission.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_12/that_wasnt_a_prediction034034.php

December 10, 2011 9:20 AM
That wasn’t a prediction

By Steve Benen


What the headline says:

President Obama predicts unemployment could drop to 8% by next year in ‘60 Minutes’ interview


What Obama actually said, in response to a question about whether we might see 8% unemployment by Election Day 2012.

“I think it’s possible. But I’m not in the job of prognosticating on the economy. I’m in the job of putting in place the tools that allow the economy to thrive and Americans to succeed. … I always believed that this was a long-term project. And you know, for individual Americans, who are struggling right now, they have every reason to be impatient. Reversing structural problems in our economy that have been building up for two decades, that was going to take time. It was going to take more than a year. It was going to take more than two years. It was going to take more than one term. Probably takes more than one president.


Perusing the media this morning, it’s apparently too late. Mark Halperin ignored the context of the president’s full answer, as did Business Week and a host of other major outlets.

Soon, it will simply be taken as a given: Obama “predicted” the unemployment rate would drop to 8% by Election Day, and the fact that he said he’s “not in the job of prognosticating,” and is looking at this as a long-term effort, will simply be ignored.
Refresh | +20 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sadly, you are probably right.
The headline at least says that Obama predicted that it "could drop" to 8%, not that it "would drop" to 8%. But in the hands of the MSM, that "could" will probably soon become a "would" and the bullshit will be off and running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Every time I hear the word "promised", I want to SCREAM, "What kind of idiot do you take me for????"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. So sad. And people around here don't get why some of us don't like their piling on. Whatever
Edited on Sat Dec-10-11 12:36 PM by patrice
our own LEGITIMATE problems/issues are with this administration are, those issues are significantly damaged by piling on with the likes of Mark Halperin et al.

So, I say that sort of thing is motivated more by piling on (and earning certain kinds of PR creds) than it is about getting progress on whatever they SAY the issues/solutions are.

People are saying something TTE, "Stand up and fight FOR us!!" and pulling the rug out at the same time and then ridiculing him for __________________________________.

I call BULLSHIT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's not "All or nothing."
"You're either with us or against us."

Some folks are just honest about what they see. There is nothing wrong with that and good luck getting everybody to say only what you want them to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't want them to say only what I want them to say. I want them to be honest about what they are
saying. Anything less than thorough self-critical honest analysis is, intentionally or not, of the oppressor. People who don't know/do this may say they're about freedom and problem solving, but repeating the same old patterns only replicates the path which brought us here: power acquisition derived from pontificating absolute truths and predictions, based on exclusively their own selective and biased "knowledge".

We live in a universe of probabilities and yet people pretend that they have such a perfect grasp on ALL factors that their propositions, which BTW likely will vitally HURT more people than they might help, aren't propositions at all, but are rather absolute truths that the rest of us MUST accept or receive the consequences, people's lives be damned. If it's wrong for the Right to do that, then it's wrong for the "Left" to do it too.

All they have to do to get along with me is admit the flaws in their own "knowledge". Probabilities free people. Absolutes oppress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1
I cant stand those who use misinformation and exaggeration to push their viewpoint. The GOPers do this all the time but we also see it here frequently from those who are supposed to be on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What they are doing is DANGEROUS, but they refuse to own that FACT, or they dont care. nt
Edited on Sat Dec-10-11 12:39 PM by patrice
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Dangerous to who?
Tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The stakes are high so lots of money is flowing in various ambiguous environments, e.g. media/the
internet and that's only the public venues.

Powerful people are beating the drums for War on Iran and that's only the tip of the iceberg.

There's always the potential for scalable 9/11 2.0s so it's possible that disrupting social/economic/environmental efforts of any kind is turning into a profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. self delete
Edited on Sat Dec-10-11 02:47 PM by patrice
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Okay. Show us you do that then.
Show us how it's done. And why do you assume people are not honest? Of you disagree, then please argue your point instead of attacking people's honesty. Saying a politician is above critique is never ginna fly. That's honest tight there. Now please show us, if you care to, your examples of what the honesty you want to see looks like. I'm serious. Just trying to understand what you're saying. I mean no disrespect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well, to be fair,
maybe the reporters just didn't feel up to the challenge of spelling "prognosticating."

Then again, misreporting what was actually said is an easy way for the truth-tanglers to score points in their grand game of anti-Administration propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. THEY NEED FLASHY QUICK STATEMENTS

THEY ARE ALL PROPAGANDISTS IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER :argh: :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. So Obama never used 8% in any context? Only the questioner did?
Oh, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I don't listen to rightwing talk (or even corporate MSM)
so I don't know who said who said what. But this seems like it's making much out of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. What you don't watch doesn't matter, it's the perception
those who do watch will get, and all these people are being disingenuous in the extreme. It does matter; what's wrong with the truth? Here is what Halperin wrote...

In "60 Minutes" interview set to air Sunday, Obama says "I think it's possible" unemployment could fall to 8% by November 2012.

Read more: http://thepage.time.com/2011/12/09/potus-8-in-range/#ixzz1gA1pFpJa



Business Week...

Obama: Jobless rate could fall to 8 percent

By STEVE PEOPLES

President Barack Obama says the nation's unemployment rate could drop to 8 percent by next fall's election.

more...

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9RH9HAO2.htm

And a bunch of others...

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&btnmeta_news_search=1&q=Obama+unemployment+8+percet&oq=Obama+unemployment+8+percet&aq=f&aqi=d1d-o1&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=28704l34136l0l34335l27l26l0l20l20l0l183l884l1.5l6l0#hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=UGfjTuP_CYLy0gH7zMnRBQ&ved=0CCoQvwUoAQ&q=Obama+unemployment+8+percent&spell=1&fp=1&biw=1280&bih=893&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&cad=b
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh I know that. It's just this is news to me.
I will only ever hear what they say by reading it here. I don't have the strength/stomach to face it alone. They lie. I know that much. If its not one thing it's something else. Getting the truth out to anyone out there who will listen, that is what's hard.

But I really believe the independents will stick with Obama in 2012. What Obama supposedly predicted but was off by 0.6% won't hurt him. This seems like a minor blip to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fuck. I get so pissed at this sort of thing. And I'd be just as pissed when they did it to Bush

Maybe even more so, since I probably would have repeated the headline uncritically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 06th 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC