Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FUCK YOU CONDI RICE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 07:57 PM
Original message
FUCK YOU CONDI RICE
Edited on Thu May-05-11 08:54 PM by Hissyspit
You Slimy Weaselly Lying Dissembling Rationalizing Inhuman War Criminal Scum





THIS is the blood that is STILL on your hands:



May 6, 2009:

"We the undersigned students, faculty, staff, alumni, and other concerned members of the Stanford community, believe that high officials of the U.S. Government, including our former Provost, current Political Science Professor, and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow, Condoleezza Rice, should be held accountable for any serious violations of the Law (included ratified treaties, statutes, and/or the U.S. Constitution) through investigation and, if the facts warrant, prosecution, by appropriate legal authorities."

I stated, "By nailing this petition to the door of the President's office, we are telling Stanford that the university should not have war criminals on its faculty. There is prima facie evidence that Rice approved torture and misled the country into the Iraq War. Stanford has an obligation to investigate those charges."


And Fuck You John Yoo, Too.

LAWRENCE O'DONNELL INTERVIEW HERE: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=581121&mesg_id=581121


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't hold back.
Tell us what you really think.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. exactly what I was thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillyJack Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. oh we won't (I'm not associated with Stanford) but I LOATHE her past actions n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. She brought up her students TO DEFEND THIS THAT SHE DID
Edited on Thu May-05-11 08:15 PM by Hissyspit
She is FILTH:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. VIDEO: Rachel Maddow's Response to Rice's Interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
86. O'Donnell is lying. Dr. Rice DID address the issue of finding
no WMD, saying they acted on intel THEY WERE PROVIDED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #86
92. Funny how I had better and more confirmable intel from the papers at the time...
at least those willing to cover El-Baradei, Scott Ritter, Hans Blix, and the well-known history of how the UN mission DESTROYED ALMOST ALL WMD CAPABILITIES OF IRAQ BY 1993.

There is no excuse for these liars claiming otherwise. She was in the admin from the start and knows very well that the Bush regime after stealing the election arrived with the intent to attack Iraq as soon as feasible, as administration renegades like O'Neil made clear. She knows they were liars, and she knows the Powell presentation to the UN was bullshit through and through. How can anyone know it? Watch it and pay attention to the construction of an invalid case being made right in front of you. It's all, I point at a picture of a truck or a container and make up bullshit about what's inside. They rely on public credulity (US public, not world) and their ascribed authority of position, not on anything that would pass as a presentation of evidence in any real court or even academic debate.

At any rate, since the aggressive war was launched by the Bush regime the details of the Niger forgeries, the Plame witchhunt and many other lies devised in constructing the "WMD" myth have emerged. They are NAKED. Only respect for authority prevents anyone from seeing it.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #92
99. Anyone who read Knight-Ridder's Coverage Knew the Lies While They were Happening
Edited on Fri May-06-11 11:13 AM by JPZenger
The late great Washington Bureau of the Knight-Ridder newspapers provided detailed and accurate coverage of the lies - while they were happening. There were detailed news stories during the build-up to the war that exposed the deceit. They were largely based upon mid-level career professionals from the State Dept. and other federal agencies who were talking to key reporters, because they were so shocked at what was going on.

Meanwhile, the other national media outlets were relying entirely upon political appointees for their information.

Knight-Ridder included large circulation newspapers in Philadelphia, Florida and California, among other places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #99
142. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #92
102. + infinity...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #86
110. It's the president's job to carefully question all intelligence,
all facts and all opinion presented to him.

This morning I received a copy of an e-mail excoriating President Obama for carefully listening to all sides, all opinions available to him before giving the signal to get Bin Laden. Obama did exactly what a president is supposed to do -- exercise utmost caution before taking human lives and listen to the critics as well as the advocates of an idea.

Bush's mistake was to simply swallow the intelligence he received whole without chewing, without considering its merit.

Either that, or (and there is a very good chance this is the reality) the whole bit about the faulty intelligence is a big fat lie.

If you read the Sorenson book on Paul O'Neill's experiences in the first year or so of the Bush White House, The Price of Loyalty, you will learn that within the first months of the Bush presidency, Bush's top foreign advisers were discussing how to parcel out the Iraq oil fields.

If O'Neill's book is true, then there is a strong likelihood that the faulty intelligence was not the fault of our intelligence apparatus. There is no evidence that O'Neill's book is false. Thus, the faulty intelligence was simply an excuse for the Bush administration to do what it wanted: invade Iraq and take control of the oil fields.

We all rationalize our mistakes. We all need to make ourselves look and feel better than we deserve. It is human nature. Condoleeza Rice is human, and that is what she is doing and did in the O'Donnell interview. She is trying to make herself look better than her reality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duval Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #86
115. Respectfully disagree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #86
141. Bullshit.
Edited on Fri May-06-11 06:00 PM by Hissyspit
They stovepiped and fabricated intel. There was PLENTY of outcry that the intel was questionable AT THE TIME, including from the intel agencies.

DOCTOR Rice knows damn well, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solarman350 Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #86
145. intel wasn't "Provided," it was fabricated by the bush CRIME family
Edited on Fri May-06-11 06:31 PM by solarman350
So, let's keep it straight...at least on this forum. Not defending the CIA, but they went along for the ride on this one. Outing of Valerie Plame by the bush CRIME family clearly illustrates that. The "just following orders" excuse doesn't work here either.....EVEN if you substitute "intel" for "orders." Eventually, CIA agents will definitively prove that the intel they provided to the bush CRIME family was not the same intel that the latter claims to have acted on. Wikileaks might even have ALREADY leaked this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #86
147. Who provided them the intelligence?
IIRC Bush was running a separate intelligence processing facility in the days leading up to the war. The only reason I can think of to do that--considering the national centers provide good information--is Bush wanted an IPF in place that would always tell him what he wanted to hear.

So! If Bush's IPF was telling him Saddam was making chemical warfare agents, the rest of the intelligence community was telling him they weren't and Bush wanted to use an Iraqi chemical program as justification for the war he'd decided to hold long before he was installed, do you really think he's going to listen to the rest of the community?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solarman350 Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #147
149. Where is the intel document or file that bush used as actionable intel to invade Iraq?
That's the file that needs to be subpoenaed in a court case (Hague/ICC, etc.). If it got released to the Public in an electronic form, the link to that would be helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #149
156. Just off the top of my head, I'd say there's not one
Let me ask you a very simple yet very sincere question: If you were the person giving Bush the "actionable intel" necessary to invade Iraq, intel which used the "RECTINT" (rectal intelligence--basically, pulling it out of your ass) discipline, would you put anything on paper? I know I wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solarman350 Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #156
157. Actionable Intel Would have an electronic/hardcopy record
I sincerely doubt that it was verbal, and not written down. You weave a great narrative, but I doubt that's how it REALLY went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #157
161. Good luck trying to find a record.
http://oversight-archive.waxman.house.gov/documents/20070420120552.pdf

Mike Duncan
Chairman
Republican National Committee
3 10 First Street, SE Washington, DC 20003
April 20, 2007

Dear Mr. Duncan:

I am writing to inform you that I will be scheduling a business meeting of the Committee for Wednesday, April 25,2007, to consider a motion to subpoena the Republican National Committee for documents relating to possible violations of the Presidential Records Act and the Hatch Act by White House officials.

The Committee has sent four separate letters to the RNC over the past month regarding the use by White House officials ofe-mail accounts controlled by the RNC. As you know, the Committee has requested basic information about the e-mail accounts, such as the identity of the officials using these accounts and the volume of relevant e-mail communications in the RNC's possession.

The Committee has also requested a limited set of e-mails related to whether Bush Administration officials have used federal resources to help Republican political candidates.
In response to these repeated and reasonable requests, the RNC has failed to provide any of the requested documents. Moreover, the RNC has refused to provide even the most basic information within its possession regarding who at the White House held RNC e-mail accounts or how often they communicated through these accounts.

I hope you will reconsider the RNC's position. If the RNC provides the information and documents requested by the Committee before April 25 or commits to a firm production schedule that will meet the Committee's needs, I will reassess whether compulsory measures are necessary.



THIS WEEK in review: White House Says It Destroyed Hard Drives = CREW v. EOP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3047807


Email-Gate FACTS: Felons, georgewbush.com, gwb43.com , et. al.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x523978
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #157
166. Dude! We're talking about George W. Bush!
The absence of hardcopy was no impediment to Bush's mission of invading Iraq and killing Saddam, damn the consequences.

The real scary thing is, even if Bush's own "tell me what I want to hear" intel facility would have told the Republicons there's no reason to attack Iraq, they would have decided to do it anyway and said something like "Intelligence reveals Saddam has an active nuclear and chemical weapons program." The nice thing about intelligence is that it's classified. If the press would have asked to see the product: "I'm sorry, that's classified." To know which agency picked it up: "I'm sorry, that's classified." You can go on and on with this, but Shrub could very easily have lied his way into a war using "secret information" that only the White House and the originating agency--which, of course, is Cheney's ass because no one in the Bush Administration was as full of shit as he--can see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #86
150. The Bush adninistration had the UN inspectors in Iraq and
Edited on Fri May-06-11 07:35 PM by MasonJar
removed them so they could attack, even though those inspectors made it quite clear there were no weapons. The Bushista wanted to attack and kill Iraqi civilians and leaders for its own reasons. They knew full well that Iraq was no threat to the USA. They LIED. THAT INCLUDES RICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. +5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
63. STILL not what that b**** deserves, which is a trial at the Hague with her husb....Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #63
83. Good job WinkyDink. My sentiments exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainlillie Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #63
108. ITA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #63
136. Exactly..
they also use the same tactics when they don't want to answer questions. Let me finish!Let me finish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
She has reignited another debate. Back to the WMDs and her lie about Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Finally somebody else besides me noticed the Canada lie!!
Edited on Thu May-05-11 09:41 PM by ClusterFreak
I just about shit when she said Canada was part of the coalition!! It had to have been deliberate too, because the fact that Canada did NOT go with Bush into Iraq would have been something which Condi and the whole Bush regime would remember. They wouldn't forget that their closest neighbour and best friend on this planet refused to join them on this. Condi didn't misspeak....she just thought she could blow it by Lawrence by saying it, which unfortunately for him, worked. People like you and I caught it though!!

:thumbsup:

on edit: But we did go to Afghanistan. And like the U.S., nearly a decade later we are still there. Fighting and dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #27
44. That really irked me how does one blatantly lie and everyone accept it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
139. There were a number of failures. One the Democrats were hiding under their desks afraid to look
unpatriotic. Two the media was/is in the pockets of those profiting from war. They didn't do their job. Three, we the general public basically stayed home and let our government murder hundreds of thousands of innocents. History will not look kindly at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
admonish Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #27
56. she was thinking Harper had a majority back then
Canada did not join in Iraq's shenanigans but had Harper had his majority as he does now, he'd probably have joined in. I swear the Christian fundies from both sides of the border will follow a path to bring Jesus back irregardless of these facts a: it's been tried many times unsuccessfully before and b: Jesus makes His own rules and c: sane but lazy will eventually begin to vote these nutjobs out of the loop. O.K. rule c: sounds as crazy as a Christian fundie but I can only have faith in the people, can't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
61. The Bush war criminals told so many lies it's hard to keep track
But the Canada lie has been repeated by others, notably Arnold Schwarzenegger while making a speech IN Canada:

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Politics/20110128/schwarzenegger-montreal-troops-110128/

Schwarzenegger praises Canadian troops ... in Iraq

(Much like that other idiot Ann Coulter trying to put Canada in Vietnam)

Another lie Kindasleazy repeated last night (and after all, lying is all she did in the interview) was her continued insistence that Bush attacked Iraq because of the threat Iraq posed but later Rice compared the Iraq invasion with Libya! I was waiting for O'Donnell to criticize Rice's bait and switch. Did Bush attack Iraq because of a false threat his administration ginned up or was it a humanitarian effort? An even more ridiculous falsehood.

They're free to continue spreading their lies because we didn't insist they face justice for those lies and the literally millions of lives their lies destroyed. This is one great failure of the Democratic Party and the nation as a whole. We can still bring them to justice.

Now that bin Laden is dead it's time we make bringing our own war criminals and terrorists to justice a top priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
95. Yes, I didn't think Lawrence was as well-prepared as he should have been.
His staff prepared some good questions, but he didn't seem adequately prepared for her answers, which surprised me, because some were predictable. As a result she was able to deflect him and get him to back down then move onto other questions.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #95
135. I agree...
All through the interview I kept saying.Why doesn't he keep asking her what did Iraq have to do with finding Osama and what did it have to do with 911..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #95
143. I agree. He was right that there was world opposition to the war at the time, but
did not list examples, just brought up the coalition.

Inspectors objected, legal experts objected, governments objected and we had the largest anti-war demonstrations in history before the start of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thornleylv Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
60. That's right
Edited on Fri May-06-11 04:50 AM by Thornleylv
I caught that also when she could not come up with more than four countries that were part of the coalition she lied and said Canada. They never helped in that war. Maybe the first Iraq war. She can not stop lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Including Doug Feith, FUCK YOU, Feith!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. blood pressures are rising damn criminals
they ALL should be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R.
Thank you for saying so, Mr. Spit.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wonder if GWB had a thing for this promoter of death of American soldiers and innocent people.
You know what they say about like minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
57. yes, and something about birds/of a feather; dogs/fleas too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
106. Rice did accidentally refer to Bush as her "husband"
A match made in hell, for sure.

http://www.slate.com/id/2099516/

Condi's Inner Life

What Freudian slips door don'ttell us about politicians.

By Laura KipnisPosted Monday, April 26, 2004, at 6:36 PM ET

"Could preternaturally self-composed National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice actually have a roiling inner life? Is she tormented by needs, longings, embarrassing fantasies? So the world wondered after New York reported what it benevolently called a "poignant faux pas" committed by Rice at a recent D.C. dinner party. What Rice reportedly said was this: "As I was telling my husb" before abruptly breaking off and correcting herself: "As I was telling President Bush." Jaws dropped, we're told. And though nobody thinks Bush and Rice are "actually an item," we were nevertheless reminded that the unmarried Condi does regularly spend weekends with the president and first lady."

Ewwwwwwwwww. The thought of those two together is akin to watching slugs mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #106
154. Terrible analogy.
Slugs mating is really amazing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhVi4Z6CjZk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #154
170. The analogy is appropriate, IMO
Slugs mate suspended on a strand of mucous. Perfect analogy for these two snots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #106
165. If that scenario were real, though, one thing is sure: She would be the "brains" of the outfit. n/t
Edited on Sat May-07-11 03:33 AM by whathehell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. I am sorry to admit that I get some pleasure out of the nickname: Kinda Sleazy Rice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Woman never gave a rat's ass about anyone, least of all any of us suckers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
76. Woman never gave a rat's ass about anyone,
SHE is responsible more than anyone for 9/11.... because, like all Repugs (apparently) they can't do their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. 40 recs in 14 minutes
Yes, I saw that segment too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. I want to recommend all you are saying by 1000 - AT LEAST
Thank you for posting every shred of this.
She is in this book of mine


It's a slim volume, but her mug is in there for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Talk about revisionist history - she is full of shit! She said that they thought "maybe' Saddam
had nukes. I watched that speech at the UN, they showed pictures where the nukes supposedly were.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. K and fucking R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Omg, rivers of blood! I remember that scene on TV
and many more like it, with the blood running down Iraqi streets and cried! :cry:

She is a cold, hard, war criminal who continues to lie and continues to think people believe her.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R -I was left speechless after that interview. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. so I'm thinking I shouldn't watch the interview on rerun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. maybe a feel good but just a waste of time.... focus on something
that may happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I focus on stuff that may happen all the time.
Edited on Thu May-05-11 09:07 PM by Hissyspit
Did all through the Bush administration. Never forgetting is stuff that may happen. Thanks very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
127. This is the mentality that allows crime to prevail, over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. I do not believe I've ever seen a more ARROGANT person in my entire life.
Edited on Thu May-05-11 08:54 PM by whathehell
I could barely stand watching her.


Edited for punctuation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
96. She fits the role of some top academic officials very well, unfortunately.
She probably honed the skill while Provost at Stanford. They often are perfectly capable of lying condescendingly, and many become narcissistic if they weren't before starting the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #96
133. I heard a story of her "dressing down" a store clerk who showed her some sort of jewelry, I believe
that she thought was somehow too "cheap" and beneath her to

contemplate. I believe she said something like

"YOU may have to wear those things, but I do not"!

The story left me with the impression of her being

an insufferable elitist who "looked down" on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #133
138. unless the clerk had been rude to her, I don't understand that kind of response
You can be the richest person in the world, who wants a million $ piece of jewelry, and say the same thing nicely, something like, "sorry I may have been confusing about what I'm looking for...what I would like to see would be x, y, z...would you have anything like that here?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #138
140. I don't believe the clerk was rude to her...Considering the way she
treated L O'D, she's just an arrogant, high handed POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. I can't stand her and still recall
DUers who were saying nice things about her just because they were in love with a certain candidate during the primary race of 2008, when she spoke positively of their candidate.

Condi Rice really is one of the slimiest political operatives I have ever seen. I just wish she would have faded away by now, damn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbrnmw Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. Thank you and let me add a Fuck You Condi to yours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainlion55 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. All that blood
In addition our military used depleted uranium in all the ammo. Mutated babies and a host of other afflictions due to its use. Condi a definite big time war criminal:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
30. Thank goodness we are getting out of the wars now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. The brilliant little girl who would never open her mouth to admit that she was oh so very wrong
because her wrongness had raised a lake of blood up to her tight little lips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #31
64. Yeah, except for that "brilliant" part.
Edited on Fri May-06-11 06:46 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
32. wtf???
Edited on Thu May-05-11 10:55 PM by polly7
She named 'the Canadians' as one of the coalition on the ground 'in Iraq' firing weapons.

He's got her rattled.

How frustrating for him must that interview have been. I was pissed off just listening to her lies and spin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeremyfive Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. 100% Agreed. Lying Scum Condoleeza Rice was the WORST!
Edited on Thu May-05-11 11:11 PM by jeremyfive
I just remember her traveling from country to country lying about the United States torture program. As the torture program was revealed, it was clear that Rice had been covering up this horror that violated our signed treaties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
93. Hardly. She was on the A- or B+ level of authority and therefore should be treated nicely...
Edited on Fri May-06-11 10:25 AM by JackRiddler
assuming she is willing to testify as a witness for the prosecution (no immunity but considerations of shorter sentence) in the trial of the main war criminals, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith, Bremer, Franks et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R for the headline alone.
And kudos to Stanford community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. Rove is right
Bush had the tools in place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Nothing I can add to a perfect post. Thanks, Hissy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. K&R
Criminal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. She's in my Hall of Fame of people that make me throw up in my mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #38
71. She causes too much of it to fit in my mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. They have really managed to justify all the lying and killing they did
with these half truths. She is so arrogant that she cannot even admit that they did anything wrong. 4400+ died for their lies and the number is still growing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. yes, 4400+ U.S. service men and women have died...
Because of her, and every other neo-con lying criminal in the bush* years, but this does not count the mercenaries and contractors, the tens-of-thousands of wounded, not to mention the million+ Iraqi civilians that were killed or wounded because of these criminal actions. The human toll has been staggering.

One thing about the neo-cons: they are world-class liers, and Condi is among the most adept. It amazes me her ability to lie with such conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. I think she really thinks she is telling the truth. There is no fool like
one that believes their own lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #49
66. No, she does not. She simply knows where her money comes from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #66
97. that's my opinion as well.
There are all too many people who are more than happy to lie to get out of real work, for being nicely taken care of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #66
167. She's the worst liar on the face of the Earth. She's laughably bad.
She shakes like a frightened chihuahua whenever she tells an untruth. It's an obvious "tell" that makes me wonder how she ever got drafted by the Bush-Cheney boys to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #40
65. Never mind the amputees and brain-damaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
124. I would call it rationalizing. They are examples of class sociopathy. What her class thinks is ok is
wayyyy different than what our class thinks is ok. So what if hundreds of thousands die. They are just collateral damage.
The Ruling Class makes no errors by definition. They have been ordained to rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
41. Indeed
Never forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
42. Oh god
I forgot how arrogant and rude she was. I remember her doing the same thing during the 9/11 commission and during a senate hearing, not letting anyone get a word in and talking down to people. What a condescending bitch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #42
50. `Arrogant & rude but scared & defensive for living a ton of lies. Truth is closing in..
Edited on Fri May-06-11 01:02 AM by glinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. You're right about the
"scared and defensive". I've heard it in her voice many times when she was testifying. Her voice becomes very shallow and shaky, and that's when she talks over people. I think it was during the 9/11 commission hearings that she was accused of filibustering to suck of all the questioner's time.

Personally, I would have thought she would disappear from the public scene to avoid this sort of confrontation. Guess some people have to keep defending the indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #53
116. I think she is thrown out in front of Bush and Cheney as a line of defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #116
122. Just taking one for the team!
If she'd ever married, I could picture her as the dominated, abused spouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #122
132. Ya know, she has known GWB for years since college. Therein lies her loyalty I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #132
151. It does have that blind loyalty feel about it
I can't see it, but its possible she really is devoted to that goof-ball for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #151
160. I think they have a "thang" personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #160
162. I know a lot of people have said that
and it does make sense, but when I look at them, I just can't see it. She looks too intellectual for him and he's SO unappealing, but I suppose anything is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #151
168. Remember when she accidently referred to him as her "husband"?
Strange Freudian slip, that. It almost makes me wonder whether they've sexed.

I'm sorry, I just made myself :puke: a little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #168
169. Okay, I do remember that
Now I need to forget it again, yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #168
171. That "slip" would be difficult for anyone to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
43. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripod Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
45. Good stuff, K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xocet Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
47. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
48. perhaps she is considering a Presidential run, encouraged by others behind the scenes


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #48
68. More than she wants will come out, if so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #48
129. The other candidates would have her on a bagel for breakfast.
In a Presidential debate, she would not have unlimited time to babble on, and the other candidates - interested in their own success - would not be prepared to show her any deference, including the other Repub candidates. Hillary Clinton would verbally eviscerate her.

She would run with her tail between her legs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
51. She makes normal people
want to vomit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
52. And Madeline Albright's father, Josef Korbel, was her faculty advisor at U. of Denver...
Edited on Fri May-06-11 01:14 AM by cascadiance
... who talked her out of being a music major in to a career in international studies, which of course ultimately lead to her being Secretary of State. Korbel happened to also be my father's faculty advisor as well there on his career path to international studies.

Coincidentally, a little over a year ago right after Pearl Harbor day, I got back from a trip to visit my father when he passed away then, and I watched Laura Flanders' show on my DVR when I got back from the night he passed away, and she was interviewing the director for American Faust, a documentary on Condi Rice. Freaked me out and kind of made me ill then too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
54. rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
55. Yeah fuck you BeaverCON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
58. i hate her so much
and she lies so much, i don't think i can watch the interview. is it worth it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
59. Oh well....those war criminals are free to say and do as they please.
Being free gives them that chance...to continue to lie...freely....in their freedom....being free from prisons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
62. You guys are pretty tough on GI George's main squeeze.
"CONdie plays some mean piano/organ but she ain't so hot at ragtime," George Dumbya Bushwhacker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
67. Rachel Maddow's analysis skewered Condi
Condi Rice doesn't see any reason to learn from the past. That's quite profound on the part of Maddow. Maddow is turning out to be the smartest person in the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #67
90. Rachel is right. The horror didn't affect them personally except to profit from it, so they
would see no reason to learn from it. No conscience whatsoever. Bush, Rice, Cheney and Rumsfeld are probably the coldest people I've seen interviewed in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
69. She was very funny on "30 Rock," though.
So, perhaps she should stick to fiction ... she's good at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
70. "FUCK YOU!!!" doesn't even begin to cover it.
There are no words do describe the contempt I have for this creature and her ilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
72. I'll 210th that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayStar Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
73. Disgraceful
Condi is a disgrace to all humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
74. We were wrong assuming that Cheney was Voldemort
Condi is. What a viper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoralme Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
75. This woman makes my skin crawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
77. 'No one ever imagined a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon.'
FUCK YOU, CONDESCENDA!

Bush knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yesphan Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
78. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
79. Amen to that - K&R.
Edited on Fri May-06-11 09:06 AM by closeupready
"Mushroom cloud" deceiver. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
80. Yes, but what shoes was she wearing at the O'Donnell interview?
That's all I want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #80
85. She was wearing these.


It's the Joseph Goebbels spring collection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #85
88. Those spikes look lethal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #85
131. She loved playing the part, didn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #131
153. Definitely into role playing.
It was always about selling the Bush plan, trying to twist, fold and mutilate the facts of 9/11 to hide their incompetence and follow the plan they had wanted to follow even before Bush got into the Whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #80
148. She should have been wearing Steve Martin's cruel shoes
Carlo disappeared into the back room for a moment, and then reappeared carrying an ordi nary shoebox. He took off the lid and removed a hideous pair of black and white pumps. But this was not an ordinary pair of black and white pumps; both were left feet, one had a right angle turn with separate compartments that pointed the toes in impossible directions. The other shoe was six inches long and was curved inward like a rocking chair with a vise and razor blades to hold the foot in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim_Shorts Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
81. she looks psychotic to me
Anyone who can twist logic into a pretzel and push a policy that killed tens of thousands of people should be put away somewhere.

She looks manic when she plays the piano. Mania, narcissism and delusional behavior often go together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
82. sociopath... look upon thee and you shall know them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
84. KnR #248 She was too dumb to be National Security Advisor...or too much in the SCAM
She can Lie with the rest of them.....what a woman...sheer audacity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
87. Wish I caught the whole thing,
only the last couple of segments,

Someone upthread noted, correctly, scared and defensive. Totally true. Scared to realize that the inability to think critically and to do due diligence on the shitty intel that was being shoved up her ass by those who wanted revenge against Saddam. Defensive in that she has to live with this knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
89. k & r...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
91. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
94. with a 2x4 sideways!
Edited on Fri May-06-11 10:34 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #94
100. A 2x4 sideways would fall out
Why do you think Chevron put her name on the side of a supermax oil tanker?

http://articles.sfgate.com/2001-04-05/news/17594163_1_oil-tanker-oil-giant-condoleezza-rice

Critics Knock Naming Oil Tanker Condoleezza
April 05, 2001|By Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer

"The double-hulled giant, Condoleezza Rice, is part of the international tanker fleet of the San Francisco-based multinational oil firm, named several years ago in honor of Rice when she was a Chevron board member and stockholder."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
98. If it makes them feel any better, John Yoo is on the Berkeley law faculty
so The Big War Criminals Game is tied. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
101. Amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyByNight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
103. Requisite K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
104. empahatically agree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
105. Rec'd for unambiguous intent n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainlillie Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
107. Thank you and much love to Hissyspit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluecoat_fan Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
109. A BIG K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
111. She did it for George. She allowed herself to be deluded by him and will lie for him to her grave.
Salute to Hissyspit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
112. Heck of a job, Condi! You make Brownie look competent.
The soft prejudice of low expectations has worked out well for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
113. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orbitalman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
114. A truly excellent post, Hissy. Did Condi think for a minute....
her lies would not CATCH UP with her? Also, we knew even at the time she was in office.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
117. When Obama was laying a wreath at Ground Zero, Rumsfeld was at the Pentagon.
My first thought was "oh, are they going to arrest him? Yay!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
118. Where's the justice?
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
119. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
120. and the FAKE COWBOY too
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
121. ... and the chimp she rode in on.




:rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
123. END this interview? So why did your "security team" START a war based on lies?
It sounds like Lawrence may have touched a nerve -- too close to the truth perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
125. She will never get anything but disgust from me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxVietVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
126. Condomlicker Rice deserves to be dumped off in Iraq.
The bitch would then get just what she deserves. Let the Iraqis and Afghanis deal with the slimy bitch. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #126
134. I like that idea!
Give her a shovel and a metal detector and let her loose on Iraqi sands to redeem herself. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akbacchus_BC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #126
159. I would not wish her that as it is saying Muslims are barbaric. Her
conscience should be her guide, she is such a fucking moron. O'donnell asked her, did you speak to GW and she said yes, she was clearly lying. Those fuckers have no conscience!

These fuckers are rich and they do not give a shit about the working class or the poor people of America. Fuck her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
128. Here's the warning Condi got PERSONALLY January 2001:
The crux of the issue is a January 25, 2001, memo on al-Qaeda from counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, the first terrorism strategy paper of the Bush administration.

Clarke's memo, described below, "urgently" requested a high-level National Security Council review on al-Qaeda and included two attachments: a declassified December 2000 "Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from the Jihadist Networks of al-Qida: Status and Prospects" and the September 1998 "Pol-Mil Plan for al-Qida," the so-called Delenda Plan, which remains classified.

Despite Clarke's request, there was no Principals Committee meeting on al-Qaeda until September 4, 2001.

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #128
130. Richard Clarke, with his "hair on fire."
It's amazing to see the members of the BFEE being resurrected after bin Laden's demise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
137. Kicking to keep that subject line up there. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im1013 Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
144. Excellent Rant!!!
K & R!!


:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left coast liberal Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
146. I know. I couldn't take more than 2 minutes of her with Lawrence.
That she is STILL espousing the lies after all this time...well...it just makes me sick.

She's such a bitch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
152. With her it's not racial
but let President Obama do anything and there it is, over the top hatred and unwarranted attacks.

I never saw any of that with Rice. I guess being a Republican liar and shill lets you in the white boys club and gives you immunity.

Her lies are defended while Obama's truth is derided as lies.

This country is truly screwed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #152
155. I just noticed
She's wearing the trademark Bush pearl necklace.

Pod people, pod people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akbacchus_BC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
158. I agree with you. That woman must be Bush's side kick! He asked
her a question and she was quick on the defence regarding Bush and even threatened to end the interview. Fools like her will never learn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
163. "And Fuck You John Yoo, Too." ^+1,000 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
164. This made me feel better
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FdFf7_yUVc

Barbara Boxer asking, "Who pays the price?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 23rd 2024, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC