Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Don't Usually Cotton to Republican Pundits but. . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:24 AM
Original message
I Don't Usually Cotton to Republican Pundits but. . .
in this instance David Brooks seems to have hit upon something.


The problem is that over the past 40 years or so we have gone from a culture that reminds people of their own limitations to a culture that encourages people to think highly of themselves. The nation’s founders had a modest but realistic opinion of themselves and of the voters. They erected all sorts of institutional and social restraints to protect Americans from themselves. They admired George Washington because of the way he kept himself in check.

But over the past few decades, people have lost a sense of their own sinfulness. Children are raised amid a chorus of applause. Politics has become less about institutional restraint and more about giving voters whatever they want at that second. Joe DiMaggio didn’t ostentatiously admire his own home runs, but now athletes routinely celebrate themselves as part of the self-branding process.

So, of course, you get narcissists who believe they or members of their party possess direct access to the truth. Of course you get people who prefer monologue to dialogue. Of course you get people who detest politics because it frustrates their ability to get 100 percent of what they want. Of course you get people who gravitate toward the like-minded and loathe their political opponents. They feel no need for balance and correction.

Beneath all the other things that have contributed to polarization and the loss of civility, the most important is this: The roots of modesty have been carved away.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/14/opinion/14brooks.html?src=me&ref=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with him but the biggest narcissists are not ordinary Americans and politicians
It's the wealthy elite who believe themselves to be more worthy and entitled to everything and under no obligation to sacrifice for the greater good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm trying to become modest of my modesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. i'm the most modest person IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE!!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astroBspacedog Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No you aren't !
When I was in the third grade i had a dream that I'd accidentally walked to school naked and I'm still blushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. A guy with access to pundit power platforms like the NYT and the Sunday talk shows
lecturing us on the virtues of modesty?! That's like Ted Nugent lecturing us on the virtues of veganism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Agreed! It is a good statement. There is only one word that I would replace:
"Sinfulness!"

How about just "arrogance" or "limitations" or "realistic self-esteem."

I don't think this has anything to do with "sin!" Unless all fundamental Christians believe that they have their "special gifts" directly from God!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. I agree with some of it. The idea that voters should get what they want
actually seems reasonable. Not everything they want, but I feel he is implying that we shouldn't get what we want and it worries me that that is exactly what corporations who run the country think too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Founders founders founders founders founders founders. Let's sort out today
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 11:41 AM by Politicub
by romanticizing the imperfect men who founded our country. Really?

If the founders thought it or wrote it down, it's okay for all of eternity. They were deities among men.

Our constitution is wonderful, but interpretation must, and has, to evolve with the times.

I believe Brooks is right about people thinking too highly of themselves, but he's tarring Americans with a broad brush. It's not everyone. It was born of a disgraceful movement to discredit the role of government and continues with the narcissistic modern GOP and its tea party offshoot.

It's strange really. They venerate our founding documents, yet despise where these guide posts have gotten us. They are shackled by the chains of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. it's strange but it's consistent. they venerate the founders and the constitution the same way
they venerate god/jesus and the bible.

the glorify the founders/god/jesus and the constitution/bible but they don't try to abide by what they say or even recognize the delicate balance of often conflicting ideals in each. they simply pick and choose whatever is useful, ignoring anything else, to justify their current thinking and trumpet loudly that they got it from an indisputable source.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. neocons lecture Americans: be more like the mythical George Washington
and less like Martin Luther King Jr., that troublemaker who made Americans narcissistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. this is the same old conservative critique
"over the past 40 years or so"...

That would be 1970 "or so." That would be the same bad-old 1960's "or so" that the conservatives are always bemoaning.

Brooks isn't blaming Martin Luther King Jr., he's "just saying..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. don't think so
talks the talk... but. Also, our social attitudes have everything to do with economy and class structure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think it's pure BS. The only people this would apply aren't mentioned namely CEOs
pulling in multi-million dollar salaries, banksters and the very well off. They are the ones without shame. As for politians giving voters what they want that is unadulterated bullshit. Politicans cater to corporations, period.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nice catch, except I think he was talking about US, not THEM.
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 12:40 PM by DCKit
Inadvertent truth in projection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is why bizarre creatures like Snookie and The Situation can
be famous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think Brooks is as full of it there as he usually is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't believe that his anecdotal evidence paints the whole picture.
Conservatives are obsessed with the ideal that man is fallen, flawed and getting worse. They always point out how much better the olden days were when people held onto traditional values.

Unfortunately for them, and for anyone looking for simple answers, reality paints a very different picture. If we take the long view then the modern human is undoubtedly smarter and more moral then his progenitors. Even when we take the short view over the last 50-60 years we still see clear signs of rapid improvement. The world isn't perfect and it never will be, but as MLK said "the arc of history is long but it bends towards justice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I Disagree Entirely
with your statement that "the modern human is undoubtedly smarter and more moral then his progenitors. Even when we take the short view over the last 50-60 years we still see clear signs of rapid improvement. " So how do you account for all the stupid conservatives all of us DU' ers are so upset about who run around broadcasting their stupidity. In another thread, Bill Maher pointed out some traits of the founding fathers:

"Ben Franklin studied scientific phenomena like lightning and the aurora borealis, and were he alive today, he could probably explain to Bill O'Reilly why the tides go in and out.

James Madison was fluent in Greek and Latin, and could translate Virgil and Cicero. John Boehner can't translate Fareed Zakaria. And Thomas Jefferson was an astronomer and a physicist who founded the University of Virginia, played the violin, and spoke six languages. " So where is the "improvement" when would be leaders today don't know history, can't speak coherently and subscribe to questionable information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The Flynn Effect is pretty well established. Just like the OP your anecdotal evidence isn't
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 02:55 PM by Exultant Democracy
convincing when there is actual scientific evidence that contradicts it. The scientist that study intelligence have found a substantial increase across the board in the average intelligence of each generation when compared to the previous one. (probably for the same reason people are getting taller, better nutrition)

Obviously there have always been polymaths at the high end of the bell curve, but these outliers can't be used as the basis for an argument about the human condition in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
affrayer Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. I Hope You Do Realize That....
You're referring to the pablum the right wing politicians have been selling the country starting with Reagan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec 11th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC