|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
fried eggs
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:29 AM Original message |
if it turns out that McQueary was also a victim, would that soften your view? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well, that's some wild speculation... without, AFAIK, basis whatsoever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Evidently one of Sandusky's adopted children was a friend with McQueary when they were kids.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. McQueary grew up near Sandusky and their families were in contact since he was a kid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. Not sure to be honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoiBoy
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. No.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lady President
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
5. Might make it worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
7. i can't. i will be more sorry and empathitic to him, but no. at a certain point in life, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
8. I have mixed feelings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
9. His victims were from e Second Mile charity, not PS. And no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
irisblue
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. might explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #14 |
36. Yes definitely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
10. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
11. If it turns out that McQueary's story has massive holes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbiegeek
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. No, he had money to seek help & made a CONSCIENCE choice to do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
15. No. No. and No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raven
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
16. Only 1 reason why this big, strapping guy did not intervene: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Ockham's Razor suggests you are correct, I think. However, there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
17. So he was a 'victim' who took the pay off, and joined the circle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
18. That sounds incredibly unlikely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
20. He has either already lost his jor or will when a new head coach is hired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
21. I realize my opinion probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. This might be true if there weren't already a pattern in place. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Ummmm...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
53. I'm pretty much with you, including the implied part about not having all the information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REP
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
22. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qb
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
23. Adults are responsible for their behavior... regardless of what happened to them as children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pathwalker
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
24. It didn't stop me when I was 14 when I stopped a 12 yr. old boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renate
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
43. oh my god. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
59. Good for you! You have guts and good instincts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
26. NO, it seems he should have wanted to help the boy, IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
27. Would make a difference in any criminal charges for failure to report... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
28. No. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
29. only if he drowns kids in a tub, is female, and married to a man we could blame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Modern_Matthew
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. ROFL. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
31. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
33. Oh. Hell. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
34. Perhaps. The rape survivors I've known react to that kind of thing in so many different ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
35. Absolutely Not. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Ripley
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
37. Sure, let's also empty the prisons of all violent criminals who were the victims of abuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
38. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
39. If they don't find "victim 8" then it's a problem for the prosecution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
40. He continued, for 9 years, to work and live in that environment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Many (most?) child abuse survivors live with the abuser for decades without a peep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. First, have the victims not come forward or is it not yet reported? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. None of Sandusky's victims have stepped forward and identified themselves yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. "...a tip line has been receiving calls from alleged victims of Sandusky..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Are you asking me about other campus' or is that a rhetorical question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Both actually; but more rhetorical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SomethingFishy
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. At this point I'm not sure I would want to "step forward" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. I'm with you. It would be quite terrifying especially if a member of the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
41. Not really. And no, he should lose his job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
45. it would soften my view of McQueary, but all of them need to go, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
46. There's no evidence of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
51. I've had that thought for a few days, and here's how it may affect my view: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
55. He took a job with an institution he knew had covered up the crime.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sibelian
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
56. Well, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
57. How many here have been victims of childhood sexual abuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Sat Nov-12-11 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
58. if punishing McQueary makes it so future whistle blowers keep silent, would that matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jul 26th 2024, 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC