So they wanted Keith out before the State of the Union and GOP response?
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:45 AM
Original message |
So they wanted Keith out before the State of the Union and GOP response? |
|
We could of course have depended on Keith for the sharpest, most perceptive commentary.
I don't for one minute believe he'd have chosen to resign now.
|
musette_sf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
glinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
earthside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
... do believe this has everything to do with Obama and Immelt and Comcast.
Since Pres. Obama broke his promise on not extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, well, I just don't care about his political prospects anymore.
I have become completely indifferent to his presidency.
|
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:54 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I will miss him on Tuesday night! //nt |
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
5. interesting speculation. what day is sotu? |
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. thanks. that's going to be an interesting one. |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
6. That - and the new GOP leadership. I bet they didn't want Keith commenting on that - how else |
|
can they keep the GOP in power if Keith speaks the truth.
Shit - it's time to pull out the tinfoil hat again.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. You bothered to put it away? |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. I'll tell ya - as soon as I put it away - it's time to take it out again. |
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Nah, I think they're just showing what money can buy |
|
They just wanted him out, period, and I expect this is the beginning of the end of that network. They will kill it by diluting it into bland thoughtless nonsense like CNN is. Nobody will want to watch that garbage and then they'll shut it down because of low viewership.
I know now that my TV will not be tuned to MSNBC to watch the SOTU.
|
bluedigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 01:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I hadn't considered that. Tweety is going to be insufferable. CSPAN for sure.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. I wonder if Tweety knew. |
|
He was particularly chipper today, in a way that appeared he was buffing up his show.
It was one of my first thoughts when Keith was talking. I wonder if Tweety knew today.
|
coolhip33
(101 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
21. watch anything but MSNBC that night and everynight for that matter |
|
They need to see the ramifications of their actions...
|
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 01:14 AM
Response to Original message |
15. they wanted him out while the ink was still drying on the |
|
merger contract.
This has nothing to do with what Obama is doing. They have Obama in their pockets. Keith ..... not so much.
|
tabatha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Yes, they were trying to avoid the appearance |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 01:17 AM by tabatha
of cause and effect. That is why it happened so fast.
|
brewens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 01:21 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Damn! Keith and Rachel after work was perfect. Now I'll have |
|
a dilemma. I'd hate to bail on Rachel but the first impulse is to boycott MSNBC. I like Ed's show too. I'll have to hear something from Keith that makes it sound a lot better than what it appears to be. I would think anything reasonable that would allow me to not be pissed at Comcast or MSNBC, would have allowed for an explanation and some kind of longer notice that Countdown was going.
|
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 02:43 AM
Response to Original message |
18. I'm finding it hard to believe that GOPers would do that to Toby Keith. |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 02:44 AM by Kurovski
Isn't he proud to be an American or something?
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 02:45 AM
Response to Original message |
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 02:50 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Hopefully he will write for one of the blogs. |
|
Apparently David Shuster said that he can write and be on the internet. It's TV he can't be on.
|
charlie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 02:58 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Maybe Tweety will get another thrill up his leg on Tuesday |
|
Or maybe Obama will make Tweety "forget he's a black man" once again.
And MSNBC execs will be sure they dumped the right guy, because their crew's professionalism JUST GOT THAT MUCH MORE SOLID.
|
Honeycombe8
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-22-11 02:59 AM
Response to Original message |
23. It's possible he gave notice, and they paid his contract out & said he could leave now. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Dec 09th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.